Killua wrote:However, is Unicode support in the Roadmap?
Because more function added, more difficult to add Unicode support to all function...
Yes, i think for the 2.0 version
we will buy 100 license of xvniew for unicode support. the author of irfanview
never say when will they support unicode.
we will buy this month and wait for 2.0
thanks a lot for your great work!!
we paid and got our license for 100 users(so qucik..). now wait for version 2.0.
is there any msi package we can download for deployment?
thanks for help!!
tbsky wrote:
we paid and got our license for 100 users(so qucik..). now wait for version 2.0.
is there any msi package we can download for deployment?
thanks for help!!
tbsky wrote:
we paid and got our license for 100 users(so qucik..). now wait for version 2.0.
is there any msi package we can download for deployment?
thanks for help!!
Standard setup or zip are not good for you?
msi is easier for package deployment/upgrade in windows domain environment . it would be great if you provide msi package for commercial users.
anyway, i think we can live without it. not every software provide msi package.
With a global world, this is definitely a needed feature. Surprisingly Microsoft Picture and Fax viewer is the only browser that is capable in reading all kinds of characters but is surely lacking in control and other features. Can XnView inherit object features from MS Picture and Fax viewer. Also another nice feature that is missing is the tab close button on IE7 and firefox. Thanks for reading... I await for these features hopefully it'll be implemented sometime in the future.
hi:
last year we bought 100 user licenses and wait for unicode support.
hope the unicode support version would coming soon.
tbsky wrote:
tbsky wrote:
xnview wrote:
Yes, i think for the 2.0 version
we will buy 100 license of xvniew for unicode support. the author of irfanview
never say when will they support unicode.
we will buy this month and wait for 2.0
thanks a lot for your great work!!
we paid and got our license for 100 users(so qucik..). now wait for version 2.0.
is there any msi package we can download for deployment?
thanks for help!!
harkonen wrote:With a global world, this is definitely a needed feature. Surprisingly Microsoft Picture and Fax viewer is the only browser that is capable in reading all kinds of characters but is surely lacking in control and other features.
Not sure what you are talking about. Here in the asian world people use ACDSee 6 and up without any problems, very popular. XnView completely (!) fails as it can not handle paths nor names containing non-western characters.
That also means that XnView has - at this time - nearly zero users where most of the potential users reside.
pic_viewer wrote:Here in the asian world people use ACDSee 6 and up without any problems, very popular. XnView completely (!) fails as it can not handle paths nor names containing non-western characters.
That also means that XnView has - at this time - nearly zero users where most of the potential users reside.
This is an excellent point. I've never thought of this fact this way, and now I understand why in certain countries one software may dominate over other of it's kind - lack of unicode support is probably one of the reasons.
And the jump in digital photos usage in last few years will sure impact on software that doesn't support unicode.