Hi.
Here's the scenario:
I take a DNG, run it thorough Photoshop's image processor and get a great JPEG that retains most of it's detail and it's dimensions while reducing the file size.
I try to do the same using XnConvert and can't achieve anywhere near close to the same level of detail. I think this may have something to do with it reducing the file to 72dpi straight away for JPEG. If I had a DPI action for 300dpi though, it doesn't help.
What am I missing?
I'd love to use XnConvert for a huge batch - but not at the cost of quality.
Poor JPEG Quality
Moderators: XnTriq, helmut, xnview
Re: Poor JPEG Quality
Welcome to the forum, paulmist (-:
- Settings tab: Load format settings... » Camera RAW » Use [ Full size ]
- Output tab: Format » [ JPG - JPEG/JFIF ] » Settings...
Re: Poor JPEG Quality
Solid gold.
That was exactly it. Now I'm getting great quality.
Thank you.
That was exactly it. Now I'm getting great quality.
Thank you.