Hi all
I think I may have found the answer to this mystery:
My images are 4000 x 3000 and so are perfect multiples of 8 pixels. so that shouldn't of been a problem for the lossless operations. What I think may be going on is something called the Huffman codes. Huffman coding is an encoding ...
Search found 3 matches
- Thu Feb 02, 2012 11:10 am
- Forum: Classic - General Support
- Topic: JPEG Lossless question. Why is the file size smaller?
- Replies: 11
- Views: 6573
- Thu Feb 02, 2012 3:09 am
- Forum: Classic - General Support
- Topic: JPEG Lossless question. Why is the file size smaller?
- Replies: 11
- Views: 6573
Re: JPEG Lossless question. Why is the file size smaller?
One possible explanation: a lossless operation writes directly to file. Saving it afterwards (according to quality settings) would be an unnecessary step.
The lossless operation writes directly to file yes, and when i examine the file size afterwards it's 1MB smaller. I happened to notice too that ...
The lossless operation writes directly to file yes, and when i examine the file size afterwards it's 1MB smaller. I happened to notice too that ...
- Thu Feb 02, 2012 2:43 am
- Forum: Classic - General Support
- Topic: JPEG Lossless question. Why is the file size smaller?
- Replies: 11
- Views: 6573
JPEG Lossless question. Why is the file size smaller?
I noticed that when i took an original 7MB JPEG and applied a simple lossless operation like flip 180 degrees, the resulting file size after the lossless save is actually about 1MB lower than the original. Can i ask why it would be so much lower if the operation is lossless?
I tried it on other ...
I tried it on other ...