Search found 236 matches
- Sat Oct 18, 2025 12:12 am
- Forum: MP - General Support
- Topic: Bug with reading image
- Replies: 4
- Views: 369
Re: Bug with reading image
For fix need set as here )
- Fri Oct 17, 2025 12:58 am
- Forum: MP - General Support
- Topic: Bug with reading image
- Replies: 4
- Views: 369
Re: Bug with reading image
I understand what need uncheck ) now work normally )
- Thu Oct 09, 2025 3:44 pm
- Forum: MP - General Support
- Topic: Bug with reading image
- Replies: 4
- Views: 369
Re: Bug with reading image
Maybe , but in ACDSee Pro and other programs and browser , this work normally , because I think what this bug in XnViewMP , this is avatars , that's why DPI in this images not recalculated , besides in other images this bug not detect for example in this images all correctly )
- Wed Oct 08, 2025 6:24 pm
- Forum: MP - General Support
- Topic: Bug with reading image
- Replies: 4
- Views: 369
Bug with reading image
Hi Pierre) this file reading with bug , original file 1.jpg , buit read this file in XnView MP 19.4 as on two attachment
- Fri Aug 29, 2025 10:13 am
- Forum: MP - General Support
- Topic: WEBP
- Replies: 5
- Views: 1248
Re: WEBP
I suppose what quality range 1-100 was make when absent lossless methods , then yes , range 1-100 mean what 100 this best quality ) but after add lossless methods compression value 100 and value lossless should be identical , otherwise I methods need split to lossless and lossy and about this need ...
- Fri Aug 22, 2025 9:37 am
- Forum: MP - General Support
- Topic: WEBP
- Replies: 5
- Views: 1248
Re: WEBP
Yes , this so , but you need remember what JPEG never not was be lossless , and this means what we can say only quality in lossy mode , and because yes , values from 0 to 100 where 100 maximum quality of lossy quality ) , but in WebP available both mode , lossy and lossless , however quality range ...
- Fri Aug 15, 2025 8:18 pm
- Forum: MP - General Support
- Topic: WEBP
- Replies: 5
- Views: 1248
Re: WEBP
Maybe , but then need modify value Quality to Lossy quality , I think what if this do, users will more clear )
- Thu Aug 14, 2025 9:31 pm
- Forum: MP - General Support
- Topic: WEBP
- Replies: 5
- Views: 1248
WEBP
Hi )
I can not understand why in WEBP quality 100% does not mean lossless quality, but select lossless quality means lossless quality, why this so?
I select quality, and there not said what I select only lossy mode, because I think what this misleads )
I offer rename mode quality to lossy mode ...
I can not understand why in WEBP quality 100% does not mean lossless quality, but select lossless quality means lossless quality, why this so?
I select quality, and there not said what I select only lossy mode, because I think what this misleads )
I offer rename mode quality to lossy mode ...
- Thu Jul 24, 2025 6:08 pm
- Forum: MP - General Support
- Topic: Theme bug with XnView 1.92
- Replies: 0
- Views: 257
Theme bug with XnView 1.92
If do this :
in folder c:\Program Files\XnViewMP place this files
and next press F11 for view settings or manage database , so in final will uncorrect theme , before in version 1.80 and same this bug was absent
The cause of the manifestation of the error :
If in c:\Users\Username\AppData\Roaming ...
in folder c:\Program Files\XnViewMP place this files
and next press F11 for view settings or manage database , so in final will uncorrect theme , before in version 1.80 and same this bug was absent
The cause of the manifestation of the error :
If in c:\Users\Username\AppData\Roaming ...
- Tue Jun 03, 2025 8:58 am
- Forum: MP - General Support
- Topic: Speed decoding JPEG2000
- Replies: 4
- Views: 566
Re: Speed decoding JPEG2000
JPEG2000 support open file two methods :
1) full size
2) only windows resolution
this means what for example you opened image 4096x2304 , but you window or desktop resolution 2560x1440 оr 1920x1080 , in this mode decode images not as 4096x2304 , but as 2560x1440 or 1920x1080 , because detail smaller ...
1) full size
2) only windows resolution
this means what for example you opened image 4096x2304 , but you window or desktop resolution 2560x1440 оr 1920x1080 , in this mode decode images not as 4096x2304 , but as 2560x1440 or 1920x1080 , because detail smaller ...
- Sun Jun 01, 2025 8:13 pm
- Forum: MP - General Support
- Topic: Speed decoding JPEG2000
- Replies: 4
- Views: 566
Re: Speed decoding JPEG2000
Speed decoding JPEG2000 will be increase ?
- Thu May 22, 2025 2:24 pm
- Forum: Reproduced - TODO
- Topic: Please add SLIC - simple lossless imaging codec
- Replies: 4
- Views: 1361
Re: Please add SLIC - simple lossless imaging codec
This can add as separate plugin for tests )
- Wed May 21, 2025 7:25 pm
- Forum: Reproduced - TODO
- Topic: Please add SLIC - simple lossless imaging codec
- Replies: 4
- Views: 1361
Re: Please add SLIC - simple lossless imaging codec
When I can be try this ?
Currently I not known as this working and will I like it or not )
My format requirements :
1) compression speed , even on old PCs
2) decompression speed , even on old PCs
3) compression force , I wait what this format will smaller than JPEG XL , but faster than JPEG XL same ...
Currently I not known as this working and will I like it or not )
My format requirements :
1) compression speed , even on old PCs
2) decompression speed , even on old PCs
3) compression force , I wait what this format will smaller than JPEG XL , but faster than JPEG XL same ...
- Fri Mar 28, 2025 8:05 pm
- Forum: MP - General Support
- Topic: Why so with filters ?
- Replies: 1
- Views: 957
Re: Why so with filters ?
Thiss so and will leaved ? Or we recive unifed filters for risizer and viewer ?
Also , I want understand , what for in resizer avaiable cubic with low quality and not replaced to bicubic with better quality ) and what for in viewer absent lanczos2 mode and mitchel
please , make unifed modes in both ...
Also , I want understand , what for in resizer avaiable cubic with low quality and not replaced to bicubic with better quality ) and what for in viewer absent lanczos2 mode and mitchel
please , make unifed modes in both ...
- Fri Mar 28, 2025 7:56 pm
- Forum: Closed/Resolved
- Topic: Quality options for loading/decoding JPEG
- Replies: 15
- Views: 4205
Re: Quality options for loading/decoding JPEG
Yes , quality now it became better , but still lower as I want , quality still lower then in ACDSee Preo
You planed increase quality dithering in JPEG ?
You planed increase quality dithering in JPEG ?