Search found 18 matches
- Sat Jul 19, 2025 11:55 pm
- Forum: New
- Topic: GIF loop count is ignored
- Replies: 7
- Views: 1618
Re: GIF loop count is ignored
That playbar is a great idea and would love to see it with gif files
- Sat Jul 19, 2025 11:52 pm
- Forum: New
- Topic: Doesn't remove "read only" files and doesn't give any feedback that it can't
- Replies: 0
- Views: 54
Doesn't remove "read only" files and doesn't give any feedback that it can't
Steps to reproduce to best see this:
1. create a new folder
2. copy two images to it
3. set those two images to "read only" in windows' explorer
4. open one of those images in xnview
5. delete it
Xnview shows confirmation dialog, you click Yes, it opens next image, you THINK it removed the previous ...
1. create a new folder
2. copy two images to it
3. set those two images to "read only" in windows' explorer
4. open one of those images in xnview
5. delete it
Xnview shows confirmation dialog, you click Yes, it opens next image, you THINK it removed the previous ...
- Sun Apr 28, 2024 4:52 pm
- Forum: New
- Topic: GIF loop count is ignored
- Replies: 7
- Views: 1618
Re: GIF loop count is ignored
That is exactly what we need. A setting, so user can decide if he wants gifs to play infinitely or according to loop count set in gif file.Kadet wrote: Sun Apr 28, 2024 1:38 pm I'm not sure if it's a good idea to include the play count setting.
- Wed Apr 24, 2024 6:38 pm
- Forum: New
- Topic: GIF loop count is ignored
- Replies: 7
- Views: 1618
- Wed Apr 24, 2024 6:37 pm
- Forum: Closed/Resolved
- Topic: 1.4.3 - viewer - gif always looped | frame controls stuck
- Replies: 9
- Views: 3514
- Wed Apr 24, 2024 5:08 pm
- Forum: New
- Topic: GIF loop count is ignored
- Replies: 7
- Views: 1618
GIF loop count is ignored
With GIF format you can set a custom loop count. You can even set it to "1", so gif will only play once and stop. I don't know if this is part of official specification, but Chrome & Firefox support this, but XnView doesn't (it just repeats gif in loops). You can see an example here https://explosm ...
- Tue Dec 26, 2023 4:41 pm
- Forum: New
- Topic: Copying part of image is buggy
- Replies: 8
- Views: 3292
Re: Copying part of image is buggy
Ctrl+C should behave in the same manner as IrfanView, that is it should only copy selected fragment and that's it. Every other software behave that way, it's only XnViewMP that does it in this weird way.
- Tue Dec 26, 2023 2:46 pm
- Forum: New
- Topic: Copying part of image is buggy
- Replies: 8
- Views: 3292
Re: Copying part of image is buggy
They are right. If I close XnViewMP after copying fragment, then only this is left in clipboard
- Tue Dec 26, 2023 10:45 am
- Forum: New
- Topic: Copying part of image is buggy
- Replies: 8
- Views: 3292
Re: Copying part of image is buggy
Found a better software to see clipboard data:
https://www.nirsoft.net/utils/inside_clipboard.html
You can clearly see that there are multiple copy of that image in different formats
https://www.nirsoft.net/utils/inside_clipboard.html
You can clearly see that there are multiple copy of that image in different formats
- Tue Dec 26, 2023 10:40 am
- Forum: New
- Topic: Copying part of image is buggy
- Replies: 8
- Views: 3292
Copying part of image is buggy
XnViewMP 1.6.3 and Windows 10
Steps to reproduce:
1. Open any image in viewer mode and select part of it, like this:
Zrzut ekranu 2023-12-26 112932.png
2. Press Ctrl+C or "Edit -> Copy"
3. Open Windows Paint and press Ctrl+V or click Paste, notice that it pasted correctly only that selected ...
Steps to reproduce:
1. Open any image in viewer mode and select part of it, like this:
Zrzut ekranu 2023-12-26 112932.png
2. Press Ctrl+C or "Edit -> Copy"
3. Open Windows Paint and press Ctrl+V or click Paste, notice that it pasted correctly only that selected ...
- Wed Oct 18, 2023 6:26 pm
- Forum: Retest
- Topic: Multiple issues with XnConvert
- Replies: 12
- Views: 40889
Re: Multiple issues with XnConvert
And another thing, since you use ffmpeg, you could support converting animated gif to animated webp
https://superuser.com/a/1723044
Or use gif2webp which is a part of libwebp
https://developers.google.com/speed/webp/docs/gif2webp
https://superuser.com/a/1723044
Or use gif2webp which is a part of libwebp
https://developers.google.com/speed/webp/docs/gif2webp
- Wed Oct 18, 2023 3:35 pm
- Forum: Retest
- Topic: Multiple issues with XnConvert
- Replies: 12
- Views: 40889
Re: Multiple issues with XnConvert
In 1.6.1, i use QFile::moveToTrash (that uses IFileOperation), and if there is a problem i use this code
SHFILEOPSTRUCT file_op;
memset(&file_op, 0, sizeof(file_op));
file_op.hwnd = (HWND)parent->effectiveWinId();
file_op.pFrom = lpFrom;
file_op.fFlags = FOF_ALLOWUNDO | FOF_NOCONFIRMATION ...
- Tue Oct 17, 2023 4:24 pm
- Forum: Retest
- Topic: Multiple issues with XnConvert
- Replies: 12
- Views: 40889
Re: Multiple issues with XnConvert
I can't add more debug, i call a win32 api, that's all. But it's strange, because in 1.6.1, i've changed the method to unlink (without changing focus)
I tested it with 1.6.0 because it was the latest version at the time I wrote that post. I just tested this with 1.6.1 and it's still the same ...
- Sat Oct 14, 2023 10:40 am
- Forum: Retest
- Topic: Multiple issues with XnConvert
- Replies: 12
- Views: 40889
Re: Multiple issues with XnConvert
Sorry for late reply
Ad 1. Not fixed, I told you to make me some debug build. Just add lots of debug logging to that part of your code and let me test it
Ad 2. Confirmed fixed, but there is one small issue, just after writing the resulting file, xnconvert opens and closes source file multiple times ...
Ad 1. Not fixed, I told you to make me some debug build. Just add lots of debug logging to that part of your code and let me test it
Ad 2. Confirmed fixed, but there is one small issue, just after writing the resulting file, xnconvert opens and closes source file multiple times ...
- Wed Aug 30, 2023 5:51 pm
- Forum: Retest
- Topic: Multiple issues with XnConvert
- Replies: 12
- Views: 40889
Re: Multiple issues with XnConvert
It depends on formats.... Why it's a problem?
Reading and writing files in small chunks is much slower than when you do this in bigger chunks, even when all files are defragmented, doesn't matter if it's hdd or sdd. And it becomes even worse for NAS over standard SMB protocol (TCP overhead and ...