XnView Software

That works!
But it's too much sophisticated for a PhD holder, sorry to mention, though... :-)
I can see, you do incorporate ideas of Lyotard, Derrida, Deleuze, Foucault, R. Bart, Bataille, Baudrillard (=simulation, simulacres) = POSTMODERNISM... :-)
Nos différences sont une richesse ...

Chosen "is any" : Results: 0 file(s) found.

Again, even if ANY is being chosen, MP can search only for the both: Here, these are "Rationalism Plato"; thus, missing even one of them results in 0 file(s) found, s. the attachments. - One needs 2 terms at once even if ANY is switched to. The same meets not only for Annotation, but also for ...

Now, say it again in your terms to be searched apropos my eventual Comment / Annotation: This is my most preferable landscape in autumn!

so looking for abc def is not the same as looking for def abc...



This is not the matter of "quality" only, but also that of "quantity", too:

In MP, I must have to insert the whole string of 2 parts entirely (def abc or abc def) /strings might be as long as 10-12 terms though/ instead of ...

Now, I feel convinced that the MP coding is not as much developed as that of Classic with ver. 1.6 vs. 2.51. Thus, migrating from Classic 2.51 to MP 1.6 hasn't been rational so far.

Well, now I could state that there is an inconsistence between Classic and MP in the matter of searching:
In Classic, I may enter any of 2 (or 3, etc.) terms in Annotation, say, Plato Rationalism, so their order is of no importance, which is correct.
In MP, I may n o t do the same: I would have to ...

Thanks for your prompt reply.
No, Use catalog is unchecked.
Neither works the Quick Filter (attached).
In Metadata, Edit IPTC is grey. Too bad...

Libformat 7.170

Hello, Everyone!

This issue arises while migrating from Classic to MP: Say, I have a PNG file with embedded comment, and an annotat.ion, both seen and can be found in Classic.

They also are seen in MP in Properties, too. However, if I go to Tools > Search, then take *.* in File ...