Page 1 of 1
					
				0.78 Linux x32 - Rotate doesn't apply background color
				Posted: Thu Feb 18, 2016 2:50 pm
				by dietmar
				Pierre,
when I rotate a PNG image for let's say -20 degrees, the newly added areas (i.e. outside the original image) become transparent and do not get colored with the selected background color. Is this by intention? It does make sense with image formats that support transparency. But there should be a toggle somewhere on whether I want the background color applied or not.
Dietmar
			 
			
					
				Re: 0.78 Linux x32 - Rotate doesn't apply background color
				Posted: Thu Feb 25, 2016 2:43 pm
				by xnview
				i can't reproduce, your image is 32bits?
			 
			
					
				Re: 0.78 Linux x32 - Rotate doesn't apply background color
				Posted: Sun Mar 06, 2016 12:01 pm
				by dietmar
				xnview wrote:i can't reproduce, your image is 32bits?
Sorry for the delay in replying. I forgot to set the notify-me option.
Yes, the image in question is 32 bits. Attached.
If I rotate this image for any non-orthogonal angle, the (new) background becomes transparent even though the setting is black.
Dietmar
 
			
					
				Re: 0.78 Linux x32 - Rotate doesn't apply background color
				Posted: Wed Mar 09, 2016 2:18 pm
				by xnview
				See 
Issue 809 for current status and details.
 
			
					
				Re: 0.78 Linux x32 - Rotate doesn't apply background color
				Posted: Sun Feb 26, 2017 11:01 pm
				by helmut
				This problem is supposed to be fixed in XnView MP 0.79 or later. Could you please try and confirm the bug fix, dietmar?
			 
			
					
				Re: 0.78 Linux x32 - Rotate doesn't apply background color
				Posted: Thu Mar 09, 2017 2:23 pm
				by dietmar
				helmut wrote:This problem is supposed to be fixed in XnView MP 0.79 or later. Could you please try and confirm the bug fix, dietmar?
Yes, Helmut, this is fixed at least on 0.84 x64 which is what I tried it right now.
Regards
Dietmar
 
			
					
				Re: 0.78 Linux x32 - Rotate doesn't apply background color
				Posted: Thu Mar 09, 2017 2:49 pm
				by helmut
				dietmar wrote:Yes, Helmut, this is fixed at least on 0.84 x64 which is what I tried it right now.
Danke, Dietmar.
 

 Closed