XnConvert/XnViewMP MacOSX package

Ideas for improvements and requests for new features in XnView MP

Moderators: XnTriq, xnview

Post Reply

Universal package or not?

Yes, keep the universal package
3
75%
No, make a 32bits AND a 64bits package
1
25%
 
Total votes: 4

User avatar
xnview
Author of XnView
Posts: 31145
Joined: Mon Oct 13, 2003 7:31 am
Location: France
Contact:

XnConvert/XnViewMP MacOSX package

Post by xnview » Mon Jul 02, 2012 9:58 am

The last version is built as universal (32/64bits), but the size of the package is bigger...

Please MacOSX user, reply to this question?
Pierre.

User avatar
Schattenreiter
Posts: 43
Joined: Mon Sep 19, 2005 5:46 pm
Location: Berlin, Germany
Contact:

Re: XnConvert/XnViewMP MacOSX package

Post by Schattenreiter » Mon Jul 02, 2012 4:38 pm

These few kbyte of additional hd-space don't take the cake...in the year 2012!

Maybe with people who still have CoreSolo/HD20GB machines with ISDN-speeds for downloads... :twisted:

And why should there be a separate dl for users of Snow Leo or Lion anyway...

UB it is *thumbs-up*
HackIntosh
Mountain Lion 10.8.2G530GA-Z77M-D3HSapphire 5770Soundblaster Audigy Platinum16GB-1333-DDR3Atheros AR9280

Post Reply