other than speed that is.. or does it affect quality as well?
the 0-6 setting in webp, not the 0-100 "level" setting.
WebP - Is there a reason not to use the highest "compression method"?
Moderators: XnTriq, helmut, xnview
-
gendalf
- Posts: 69
- Joined: Thu Aug 04, 2011 1:26 pm
-
xnview
- Author of XnView
- Posts: 44933
- Joined: Mon Oct 13, 2003 7:31 am
- Location: France
Re: WebP - Is there a reason not to use the highest "compression method"?
the webp library supports 0-6 compression
Pierre.
-
ckit
- XnThusiast
- Posts: 2577
- Joined: Tue Feb 17, 2004 1:11 am
- Location: QLD, Australia
Re: WebP - Is there a reason not to use the highest "compression method"?
AMD Ryzen 3 3300X 3.8Ghz, 16Gb DDR4, RX6600XT with Dell U2520D at 2560x1440@60Hz scaling 125%
Windows 11 Pro x64 23H2, Listary Pro, PowerToys and Wintoys
Windows 11 Pro x64 23H2, Listary Pro, PowerToys and Wintoys
-
gendalf
- Posts: 69
- Joined: Thu Aug 04, 2011 1:26 pm
Re: WebP - Is there a reason not to use the highest "compression method"?
I meant does 6/6 produce worse quality than 0/6? or is it lossless compression rate (like 7zip options) - purely slower for higher compression, without the quality loss at the same "0-100 level".