XnView Shell Extension (Support & Development)
Moderators: XnTriq, helmut, xnview
-
- Posts: 2
- Joined: Mon Mar 17, 2008 10:26 am
- Location: Stuttgart
1.93.3 - SE Installation still fails while register DLL/OCX
Hello,
since a couple of versions (I think 1.92.1) any kind of installation (update or clean reinstall) fails while registering XnViewShellExt.dll with exit-code 0x5.
I also tried the stand alone setup and zip-version 2.20 of the shell extension - the same error occurred with error-code 0x8007007e.
My OS is WinXP Pro SP2 english with german MUI-pack.
I hope someone can help me.
Best regards
Tronje Bäßler
since a couple of versions (I think 1.92.1) any kind of installation (update or clean reinstall) fails while registering XnViewShellExt.dll with exit-code 0x5.
I also tried the stand alone setup and zip-version 2.20 of the shell extension - the same error occurred with error-code 0x8007007e.
My OS is WinXP Pro SP2 english with german MUI-pack.
I hope someone can help me.
Best regards
Tronje Bäßler
Re: 1.93.3 - SE Installation still fails while register DLL/
Hi man, i have this problem too, My OS is WinXP Pro SP2 in spanish,Tronje Bäßler wrote:Hello,
since a couple of versions (I think 1.92.1) any kind of installation (update or clean reinstall) fails while registering XnViewShellExt.dll with exit-code 0x5.
I also tried the stand alone setup and zip-version 2.20 of the shell extension - the same error occurred with error-code 0x8007007e.
My OS is WinXP Pro SP2 english with german MUI-pack.
I hope someone can help me.
Best regards
Tronje Bäßler
any idea??
P.S: Good Program
Re: Quality Settings
xnview wrote:XnView Shell Extension v2.00 (x86 & x64) is available.
http://download2.xnview.com/XnShellEx.exe
http://download2.xnview.com/XnShellEx.zip
http://download2.xnview.com/XnShellEx64.exe
http://download2.xnview.com/XnShellEx64.zip
Printing with Shell Extension
Some months ago I made in the thread
http://newsgroup.xnview.com/viewtopic.php?t=13433&
a suggestion:
Peter
http://newsgroup.xnview.com/viewtopic.php?t=13433&
a suggestion:
Are there some plans to add this feature?The software "Shell Picture" (http://baxbex.de/shellpicture.html - no freeware!) is very similar to "Shell Extension", but has interesting print functions.
Maybe you can add print functions too?
Peter
XnViewMP 1.6.5 German, XnConvert 1.99, Win 10
Funny thing happened to me today:
I set the ShellExt to open a submenu, and now I can't get it back to the way it was. When I select "Options" from the submenu, I get a screen with information on the file, but not the option screen for the ShellExt I used to get from the "Options" in the main Context Menu.
Any way to fix that other than uninstall and reinstall the whole thing?
I set the ShellExt to open a submenu, and now I can't get it back to the way it was. When I select "Options" from the submenu, I get a screen with information on the file, but not the option screen for the ShellExt I used to get from the "Options" in the main Context Menu.
Any way to fix that other than uninstall and reinstall the whole thing?
Resize improvement
Hi,
XnView Shell Extension is a real time saver. However, one thing in it could be improved in my opinion. When resizing a batch of images to, let's say, size of 1280x1024 pixels, portrait images will get a height of 1280 pixels.
I think most of the time it would be more convenient if resizing to 1280x1024 meant that no image will be taller than 1024 and wider than 1280 pixels. So the resized images would always fit into 1280x1024 screen.
Of course there could be a switch between current and propose behaviour in options. I think that would satisfy all users.
Thanks in advance if you consider the proposition
XnView Shell Extension is a real time saver. However, one thing in it could be improved in my opinion. When resizing a batch of images to, let's say, size of 1280x1024 pixels, portrait images will get a height of 1280 pixels.
I think most of the time it would be more convenient if resizing to 1280x1024 meant that no image will be taller than 1024 and wider than 1280 pixels. So the resized images would always fit into 1280x1024 screen.
Of course there could be a switch between current and propose behaviour in options. I think that would satisfy all users.
Thanks in advance if you consider the proposition