Re: Browser - filelist - add statusbar
Posted: Mon Jun 02, 2025 8:19 am
Merci !
Various discussion boards for XnView and related products
https://newsgroup.xnview.com/
user0 wrote: Fri Mar 14, 2025 1:30 pm XnViewMP 1.8.6 64bit
Windows11 (24H2), display resolution 3840x2160, win scaling 150%
Browser - filelist
there are few inconveniences with filelist toolbar:
- its overloaded with controls
- addressbar is too compressed
- quick filter should be the at most right place
Not for me, they are all useful and I use them a lot.wrote:"- its overloaded with controls"
The address bar is not compressed for me. I'm also running Windows at 4k with 150% scaling.wrote:"- addressbar is too compressed"
Why? The location should be optional and movable based on users' preference.wrote:"- quick filter should be the at most right place"
Quite right -- none of the listed inconveniences are inconveniences. The address bar is not compressed until the window is like 640x480, the toolbar wraps around to double-height if the window size is too small. Try it! This is all expected behavior from modern toolbars, and it has worked very well in Windows applications for decades. There is no problem with the original design.Ravanelli wrote: Sun Jun 08, 2025 12:48 pmNot for me, they are all useful and I use them a lot.user0 wrote: Fri Mar 14, 2025 1:30 pm Browser - filelist
there are few inconveniences with filelist toolbar:
- its overloaded with controls
- addressbar is too compressed
- quick filter should be the at most right place
- its overloaded with controls
The address bar is not compressed for me. I'm also running Windows at 4k with 150% scaling. See here viewtopic.php?p=202357#p202357. I actually complained about this issue before. The funny thing is now it is even worse!wrote:"- addressbar is too compressed"
Why? The location should be optional and movable based on users' preference. If you are going to make big user interface changes, at least make them optional.wrote:"- quick filter should be the at most right place"