Page 3 of 4

Posted: Thu Jan 12, 2006 12:15 pm
by Xyzzy
ckit wrote:Xyzzy, if you want to close this fine.
I don't care anymore, ever since you became a Mod you've been nothing but trouble
It's only a few days more (like a week or two), so you'll be back on calm waters shortly. You can also always ask Administrator to remove moderator status. I am sure he will do so if there's a reason.

I also experience this problem from time to time. It seems to depend very much on system. It's also been appearing here and there for quite a long time. It is more prominent in some versions and less in others. I also noted that one time, in some version, problem disappeared after reinstalling system.
Pierre investigated this problem quite a few times, in relation to different other problems, and I still think it is Windows MDI interface that gives us troubles.

X.

Posted: Thu Jan 12, 2006 7:36 pm
by Guest
Xyzzy wrote:
ckit wrote:Xyzzy, if you want to close this fine.
I don't care anymore, ever since you became a Mod you've been nothing but trouble
It's only a few days more (like a week or two), so you'll be back on calm waters shortly. You can also always ask Administrator to remove moderator status. I am sure he will do so if there's a reason.
I support your removal. A reason would be that you don't seem to understand many of the posts! I wonder if you actually use the software! One purpose of forum should be to serve as means of making the author aware of problems rather than bothering him with emails. You acting as his gatekeeper discourages participation. It would be better that moderators did not exist than to act in this way (or to aggresively promote their own ideas). You may be very talented at many things, but testing software or acting as 'chief of staff' is not one of these things.

Posted: Thu Jan 12, 2006 9:48 pm
by Xyzzy
Sorry you don't like my work. As I said, you can always let know Administrator about your point of view. I am sure he'll hear good arguments.

BTW, what experience do you have with bug workflow management? I worked for two years as an administrator of ClearCase/ClearDDTS, supporting company's teams on 3 continents. I know how such workflows should work, actually I designed them for a few projects. Bug processing is not a chat for exchanging nice remarks. If you need chat, go to a chat room.

I wonder why I even care to answer some coward...

BTW2, could you add something on topic to your post?

X.

Posted: Thu Jan 12, 2006 10:28 pm
by Olivier_G
Hello everyone, how's going? :mrgreen:

Just a little message to say that I appreciate the work done by Xyzzy:
- it's probably the first time that all requests are actually managed/followed (just check that balance on New/Open vs Resolved... for the previous 1.80!!!)
- Xyzzy being the one trying to follow up on every request, he has to be efficient... which may mean a bit pushy on some thread. You have to accept this...
(I think I experienced it through his "Give reason for your choices. Otherwise they are worthless" that I found a bit rude at the beginning... :mrgreen: ...Oh well: let those things rolling. It's all good... :P )

So yeah... overall, I like the way he does his best to help here because he is positive.

Olivier

Posted: Fri Jan 13, 2006 7:57 am
by xnview
Olivier_G wrote:Hello everyone, how's going? :mrgreen:

Just a little message to say that I appreciate the work done by Xyzzy:
- it's probably the first time that all requests are actually managed/followed (just check that balance on New/Open vs Resolved... for the previous 1.80!!!)
- Xyzzy being the one trying to follow up on every request, he has to be efficient... which may mean a bit pushy on some thread. You have to accept this...
(I think I experienced it through his "Give reason for your choices. Otherwise they are worthless" that I found a bit rude at the beginning... :mrgreen: ...Oh well: let those things rolling. It's all good... :P )

So yeah... overall, I like the way he does his best to help here because he is positive.

Olivier
Yes Xyzzy make a great job, a big thank to him :-)

Posted: Thu Jan 19, 2006 10:54 pm
by ckit
Bug still exists in RC2.

Posted: Mon Jan 23, 2006 6:40 am
by ckit
So no one else has this bug or cares?

We're getting close to XnView 1.82 Final.

Posted: Mon Jan 23, 2006 11:20 am
by Xyzzy
I've got it.
It seems it is one of the problems Pierre can't reproduce.

X.

Posted: Mon Jan 23, 2006 11:26 am
by ckit
I, definitely want this one fixed before Final release.

What video drivers are you using?
I'm using ATI 6.12 (6.13 and 6.1 are newer)

Posted: Mon Jan 23, 2006 11:39 am
by Xyzzy
ATI 6.7 or 6.8, don't remeber now.

X.

Posted: Mon Jan 23, 2006 11:42 am
by ckit
Hehehe I know what you mean, ATI don't make it easy to read the version number once it's installed.
Dam, I've already tried the video driver angle :(

Posted: Tue Jan 24, 2006 10:02 pm
by VuDu
I have to nVidia cards and I have the same problem, but like you said it's hard to reproduce.
By the way, I use Fit to Screen, reduce only. So it's not just a "no fit" problem.

Posted: Wed Jan 25, 2006 1:34 am
by Dreamer
Can't confirm the problem.

ATI X800, Catalyst v5.10, Win XP SP2
Catalyst v5.13, still can't confirm this bug.

Do you use "autohide the taskbar" in taskbar properties?

Posted: Wed Jan 25, 2006 1:39 am
by ckit
Dreamer wrote:Do you use "autohide the taskbar" in taskbar properties?
I don't, as for everyone else wait and see :)

Posted: Wed Jan 25, 2006 11:02 pm
by ckit
Bug still exists in RC3.