XnView needs Multithreading support for dual-core and quad-core CPU's!
Also making use of SSE,SSE2 and SSE3 if they available would be nice too!!
REQ Dual \ Quad Core Support
Moderators: helmut, XnTriq, xnview
-
- XnThusiast
- Posts: 2578
- Joined: Tue Feb 17, 2004 1:11 am
- Location: QLD, Australia
REQ Dual \ Quad Core Support
AMD Ryzen 3 3300X 3.8Ghz, 16Gb DDR4, RX6600XT with Dell U2520D at 2560x1440@60Hz scaling 125%
Win11 x64 24H2, Hard Disk Sentinel Pro, MS PowerToys, Process Lasso Pro, Windhawk and Wintoys
Win11 x64 24H2, Hard Disk Sentinel Pro, MS PowerToys, Process Lasso Pro, Windhawk and Wintoys
-
- XnThusiast
- Posts: 2578
- Joined: Tue Feb 17, 2004 1:11 am
- Location: QLD, Australia
-
- XnThusiast
- Posts: 2578
- Joined: Tue Feb 17, 2004 1:11 am
- Location: QLD, Australia
I'm hoping XnView 2.0 will have multi-threading for All batch operations, the rest of XnView won't benefit from multi-threading unless you're resizing really massive resolutions 

AMD Ryzen 3 3300X 3.8Ghz, 16Gb DDR4, RX6600XT with Dell U2520D at 2560x1440@60Hz scaling 125%
Win11 x64 24H2, Hard Disk Sentinel Pro, MS PowerToys, Process Lasso Pro, Windhawk and Wintoys
Win11 x64 24H2, Hard Disk Sentinel Pro, MS PowerToys, Process Lasso Pro, Windhawk and Wintoys
-
- Posts: 233
- Joined: Fri May 02, 2008 9:27 am
-
- Posts: 7
- Joined: Fri Jun 26, 2009 7:35 pm
Re:
Sorry but I disagree. Stepping through my 6MP photos on a Core2Duo E6600 could be much faster if the image/jpg loading mechanism would use several cores.ckit wrote:the rest of XnView won't benefit from multi-threading unless you're resizing really massive resolutions
AFAIR JPG would be the perfect candidate for a multi core loading as each jpeg block is independent of the others. Therefore the image could be divided easily into 2/4/8 parts which could be then loaded in parallel.
Rob