XnView Software

Few bugs are back with old xnview.manifest file only, following bugs are not present if xnview.manifest file is not there, so those bugs are in that file:



XnView 1.80 <x>

I can see the wrong selected-background color too (if full row view is disabled)

Dreamer wrote:Few bugs are back with old xnview.manifest file only, following bugs are not present if xnview.manifest file is not there, so those bugs are in that file:

It's a problem with Xp, you must use "full row select"

OL wrote:I can see the wrong selected-background color too (if full row view is disabled)

Try to scroll with a mouse wheel too - in folder with many images, down, up, down... and you get many white lines.

Dreamer wrote:

OL wrote:I can see the wrong selected-background color too (if full row view is disabled)

Try to scroll with a mouse wheel too - in folder with many images, down, up, down... and you get many white lines.

I use the standard list view here (not for thumbnail mode), so i think that it's a bug with this control when you change the background color...

xnview wrote:It's a problem with Xp, you must use "full row select"

But I can't select the files with a mouse then.

But not a big problem though.

Dreamer wrote:

xnview wrote:It's a problem with Xp, you must use "full row select"

But I can't select the files with a mouse then.

But not a big problem though.

Don't change the background color

Dreamer wrote:

xnview wrote:It's a problem with Xp, you must use "full row select"

But I can't select the files with a mouse then.

Now I see that it is possible even with "full row select" enabled, but only partially, it is not possible if the name is too long.

Now it is possible to select between two red lines only, it would be nice if you (Pierre) could make that it would be possible also between two green lines (with "full row select" enabled), but I don't know how...

>>> Pierre
Hello Pierre !

• Just a suggestion: what about a xnview.exe.manifest file embedded in the main EXE, like we have for instance in Total Commander ?
- So, any version ß, RC or whatever could have the right appropriate file.

- It works even with a compressed EXE (that's the case for TC…)

K R
Claude
Clo

Perhaps because some people for some reason prefer the classic buttons look, and incidentally don't want to have the bug Dreamer is on about. Just an random guess =)

Clo wrote:• Just a suggestion: what about a xnview.exe.manifest file embedded in the main EXE, ...

Having one executable file which runs out of the box sounds good to me.

What's wrong with the manifest file? you want XP buttons, just keep it in the folder and you have them out of the box. You don't want XP buttons (and/or want XnView to look good with full row select disabled), just delete it.
just my $0.02

OL wrote:What's wrong with the manifest file?

Dreamer wrote:Few bugs are back with old xnview.manifest file only, following bugs are not present if xnview.manifest file is not there, so those bugs are in that file:

xnview wrote:It's a problem with Xp, you must use "full row select"

But one bug is there also if I use "full row select" :

Dreamer wrote:

OL wrote:What's wrong with the manifest file?

Dreamer wrote:Few bugs are back with old xnview.manifest file only, following bugs are not present if xnview.manifest file is not there, so those bugs are in that file:

I was talking about standalone vs embedded manifest. That would not change anything to this problem if it was inside the exe, as Clo suggested. Except that you would not be able not to use it (by simply removing the file from your XnView folder, unless Pierre adds an option for this.