Page 1 of 1
Clear identification for test versions
Posted: Wed Dec 16, 2009 12:16 am
by helmut
Whenever there are alpha or beta versions available of XnView (Windows), one can clearly tell that it is a test version: In the title bar it says "XnView 1.97 RC1 (instable)" for example. For XnView MP the same should be done. Currently, people might think that XnView MP 0.21 is a stable and fully functional version, which is definetely not the case.
Re: Clear identification for test versions
Posted: Wed Dec 16, 2009 7:51 am
by xnview
helmut wrote:Whenever there are alpha or beta versions available of XnView (Windows), one can clearly tell that it is a test version: In the title bar it says "XnView 1.97 RC1 (instable)" for example. For XnView MP the same should be done. Currently, people might think that XnView MP 0.21 is a stable and fully funcational version, which is definetely not the case.
Right
Re: Clear identification for test versions
Posted: Wed Dec 16, 2009 2:25 pm
by JohnFredC
For testing purposes, it would be great if we could see a sequential build number, too!
Re: Clear identification for test versions
Posted: Wed Dec 16, 2009 2:30 pm
by oops66
+1 for both suggestions
Re: Clear identification for test versions
Posted: Wed Mar 17, 2010 5:56 pm
by oops66
Done with the Linux MP 0.25 Version - Thank you Pierre