Page 1 of 2
RC2 & 1.74: File index is misssing in status bar
Posted: Sun May 22, 2005 7:23 pm
by Dreamer
If I go from Browser to Viewer, "File index" (#/##) is misssing for actual image in the status bar, if I go to next image it's OK.
e.g. 3/12 | Image.jpg | 1024x768 ...
XnView 1.80 <x>
Posted: Sun May 22, 2005 7:47 pm
by marsh
It looks correct to me. Because, when you click on first image, would you want
to see 1/1? Also, you would always know what the first image is that you select.
Posted: Sun May 22, 2005 9:01 pm
by OL
It doesn't look correct to me (but it's not a major bug)
You double-click any thumb a folder, then must click Next then Back in the viewer to see its index.
Re: RC2 & 1.74: File index is misssing in status bar
Posted: Mon May 23, 2005 5:50 am
by ckit
Dreamer wrote:If I go from Browser to Viewer, "File index" (#/##) is misssing for actual image in the status bar, if I go to next image it's OK.
e.g. 3/12 | Image.jpg | 1024x768 ...
I can confirm this bug, took me a little while though
Posted: Mon May 23, 2005 7:20 am
by scratch
caught this myself yesterday (my first day using xnview, actually). minor bug, but still quite annoying.
Re: RC2 & 1.74: File index is misssing in status bar
Posted: Mon May 23, 2005 7:40 pm
by xnview
Dreamer wrote:If I go from Browser to Viewer, "File index" (#/##) is misssing for actual image in the status bar, if I go to next image it's OK.
e.g. 3/12 | Image.jpg | 1024x768 ...
It's not a bug, when you open a picture i don't import full file list, so i don't know how many files are here. After Next/Previous, i know it
Very annoying?
Posted: Mon May 23, 2005 7:52 pm
by Olive
No not very annoying, but if you could implement it easily and without degrading performance that would be nice =)
Posted: Mon May 23, 2005 7:54 pm
by xnview
Olive wrote:No not very annoying, but if you could implement it easily and without degrading performance that would be nice =)
I've not added it for performance.
Posted: Mon May 23, 2005 11:33 pm
by Dreamer
xnview wrote:Olive wrote:No not very annoying, but if you could implement it easily and without degrading performance that would be nice =)
I've not added it for performance.
Performance = time? I see no delay if I switch from image without file index to image with it.
It's not very annoying, but if I switch from browser to viewer, often I'd like to see how many images are there...
So if it's easy to do/fix, could you do it please?
If not, never mind, add reply, rename to [OK?] and I'll move it to Solved... forum then.
Posted: Tue May 24, 2005 6:50 pm
by helmut
xnview wrote:Olive wrote:No not very annoying, but if you could implement it easily and without degrading performance that would be nice =)
I've not added it for performance.
It's not a big issue, I think. So if performance (=speed) is affected a lot when fixing this, this should not be fixed.
Posted: Sat May 28, 2005 8:18 pm
by scratch
just curious, how much of a performance hit is there?
Posted: Sat May 28, 2005 9:14 pm
by Dreamer
scratch wrote:just curious, how much of a performance hit is there?
Me too.
scratch wrote:caught this myself yesterday (my first day using xnview, actually). minor bug, but still quite annoying.
Yes.
Posted: Fri Jun 03, 2005 11:36 pm
by Dreamer
After some testing, I see no delay when "file index" is creating.
Tested with the 1st image (183 images in dir.), go from browser to viewer, press Home key, file index is created = no delay!
Posted: Sat Jun 04, 2005 7:42 am
by xnview
Dreamer wrote:After some testing, I see no delay when "file index" is creating.
Tested with the 1st image (183 images in dir.), go from browser to viewer, press Home key, file index is created = no delay!
But if have 10000 images, and sort by date for example, there will be a delay...
Posted: Sat Jun 04, 2005 11:12 am
by helmut
For XnView 1.80 I think we just keep it they way it is now. Postponed.