Page 1 of 1

May I disable the email signature?

Posted: Sat Oct 30, 2010 6:13 am
by drugo
may i disable the email signature ?
Sent by XnView, http://www.xnview.com

thanks

cheers

Re: may i disable the email signature?

Posted: Sat Oct 30, 2010 8:45 am
by XnTriq
XnView is being developed by an independent programmer who makes his software available as freeware for personal use. Are you sure you want to eradicate even the slightest indication of what software you were using to send a photo? Take a look at the headers of messages you receive: Just about every e-mail client puts its signature in the X-Mailer, X-MimeOLE or X-Newsreader field.

Re: may i disable the email signature?

Posted: Sat Oct 30, 2010 4:16 pm
by drugo
XnTriq wrote:XnView is being developed by an independent programmer who makes his software available as freeware for personal use. Are you sure you want to eradicate even the slightest indication of what software you were using to send a photo? Take a look at the headers of messages you receive: Just about every e-mail client puts its signature in the X-Mailer, X-MimeOLE or X-Newsreader field.
i agree 100%

xnview a superb piece of software ,is a jam , and a donation is a must

by the way i send some photos , and the receiver tried to answer/sending the answer email to the link
yes i know , he was a fool
but is not very young

by the way thank you so much!

Re: may i disable the email signature?

Posted: Wed Nov 10, 2010 10:35 pm
by helmut
I disagree:
Self advertisement by default is soso or even o.k., but if a user does not want this advertisement, he/she should be able to disable it in some way.

Imagine this szenario: Graphic design company X uses XnView in a professional context (naturally, licences have been purchased) and regularly sends out image files to customers. Should all their customers really receive a "Sent by XnView" advertisement? I think "No.".

Re: may i disable the email signature?

Posted: Thu Nov 11, 2010 2:00 am
by XnTriq
helmut wrote:I disagree:
Self advertisement by default is soso or even o.k., but if a user does not want this advertisement, he/she should be able to disable it in some way.
You think it's even too much to ask from a freeware user to think twice, whether it's absolutely necessary to remove that link? After all, we're not talking about aggressive marketing tactics through obtrusive watermarks, annoying nag screens or hidden ads.
helmut wrote:Imagine this szenario: Graphic design company X uses XnView in a professional context (naturally, licences have been purchased) and regularly sends out image files to customers. Should all their customers really receive a "Sent by XnView" advertisement? I think "No.".
Sure, it's a whole different ballgame with paying customers. They shouldn't be bothered with the “This page was generated with XnView” footer on their HTML galleries or the “Sent by XnView” signature in their e-mail.