XnView Software

"Use high quality" is greyed out when "Use embedded thumbnails" has been checked (options>browser>thumbnail). As a result, embedded thumbnails are not optimized and most of them look ugly in the browser

Olive wrote:"Use high quality" is greyed out when "Use embedded thumbnails" has been checked (options>browser>thumbnail).

See please http://newsgroup.xnview.com/viewtopic.php?t=2450 .

As a result, embedded thumbnails are not optimized and most of them look ugly in the browser

I don't think embedded thumbnails ever used the High Quality setting, nor that it would make much sense, as there probably isn't much data to antialias.

Roman

Could you please test, before stating that what I said doesn't make sense?
If needed I can upload samples whose embedded thumbnails look good in RC5 (with both "use embed" and "hq" on) but look fugly in RC6 (with "use embed" on and "hq" greyed out)

Olive wrote:Could you please test, before stating that what I said doesn't make sense?
If needed I can upload samples whose embedded thumbnails look good in RC5 (with both "use embed" and "hq" on) but look fugly in RC6 (with "use embed" on and "hq" greyed out)

Yes, when embedded thumbnails are greater than thumbnail size, they are resized. For this, i must always use high quality

Olive wrote:Could you please test, before stating that what I said doesn't make sense?

Hey, I never said that...

Roman

Olive wrote:"Use high quality" is greyed out when "Use embedded thumbnails" has been checked (options>browser>thumbnail). As a result, embedded thumbnails are not optimized and most of them look ugly in the browser

This has been fixed in RC7.

Confirmed.