Batch processing issue
Posted: Sun Nov 01, 2015 9:59 pm
Hello,
I've been using XnView for years, since I appriciate its interface and usability, but today I'll report what seems to be a bug.
According to my test, Batch processing give a different outcome from manually worked out operations.
First I manually applied a series of operations on an image - those listed below.
resize
gammasat: 0,01 (minimum)
automatic contrast
negative
enhance edges: 90
enhance focus
levels: blackpoint 105 (whitepoint left as is)
conversion -> binary: no dither
Then I used the Batch processing with the same operations on, in the same order.
Though the operations are the same, batch processing gives a different and worse outcome.
I worked with XnView 2.20 version (portable edition from portableapps.com) and I repeated the batch processing with v. 2.34 (portable), by loading the .xbs script file previously saved - the outcome is identical.
You can download the original file here http://allegato.eu/download/ef4e9531ba5 ... e25bc.html
I've been using XnView for years, since I appriciate its interface and usability, but today I'll report what seems to be a bug.
According to my test, Batch processing give a different outcome from manually worked out operations.
First I manually applied a series of operations on an image - those listed below.
resize
gammasat: 0,01 (minimum)
automatic contrast
negative
enhance edges: 90
enhance focus
levels: blackpoint 105 (whitepoint left as is)
conversion -> binary: no dither
Then I used the Batch processing with the same operations on, in the same order.
Though the operations are the same, batch processing gives a different and worse outcome.
I worked with XnView 2.20 version (portable edition from portableapps.com) and I repeated the batch processing with v. 2.34 (portable), by loading the .xbs script file previously saved - the outcome is identical.
You can download the original file here http://allegato.eu/download/ef4e9531ba5 ... e25bc.html