[Discussion] Does XnviewMP need keywords additionally to categories?
Posted: Mon Aug 06, 2018 10:04 am
Other software like ACDSee has both, categories and kewords.
And I like this concept better.
Why? Categories are more a general hirarchical structure vs. keywords that can be considered as associative content description.
Therfor categories often come in a tree layout with tedious way to search and add multiple categories, while adding keywords is normally a process by simply typing the keywords one by one into a field only seperated by comma or enter. Existing keywords will simply be recognised as I type and used and new keywords will be generated on the fly while typing.
Therfor I would be absolutely for adding keywords to XnviewMP for content description and hassle-free addition.
And I like this concept better.
Why? Categories are more a general hirarchical structure vs. keywords that can be considered as associative content description.
Therfor categories often come in a tree layout with tedious way to search and add multiple categories, while adding keywords is normally a process by simply typing the keywords one by one into a field only seperated by comma or enter. Existing keywords will simply be recognised as I type and used and new keywords will be generated on the fly while typing.
Therfor I would be absolutely for adding keywords to XnviewMP for content description and hassle-free addition.