xnview wrote: Fri May 13, 2022 9:20 amSorry but no, it is '/' by default for all platforms...
Good, so you acknowledge that it was set by XnView.
Now: What does it mean/do?
…and how can it lead to duplicate paths?
Not just thumbnails but file's info & categories, rating too
Ah, so it
is inclusion in the catalog, in general, as I first (obviously) assumed?
Well, in that case, I'll have to re-respond to several points:
a: If I import C:\folder1, and want all recursive folders imported, then I'd obviously want all future folders to be imported as well.
Automatically, these folders will never be imported
My point exactly.
That is obviously a flaw. When one imports a folder recursively, that will pretty much always mean that one wants all subfolders included …regardless of whether or not those are current folders or future ones.
I see absolutely no possible reason, for why future folders wouldn't be included.
b: If all folders I browse, get imported into the catalog, anyway, what is the point of having a manual importation option? (Also: having browsed folders get imported, is a perfectly fine option to have, but to have it forced on you, is really annoying and frustrating)
It's the same function, 'import folder' is used to create thumbnails for a large photo collection before to browse them.
That answer doesn't, in any way, address my point.
No, the catalog is only updated when you browse the folder or open an image in the folder
1. That would mean that, whenever I browse a folder that is in the imported list, XnView would be able to see if there is a new (not yet imported) folder. If the import-list would be the way I suggeest, this would then mean that (if the imported folder is marked as recursive) XnView would then know to import that new subfolder. This could also be applied to when you browse directly into a new folder, in that XnView can check the import-list, to see if it is a subfolder to a recursively included folder, and import it, if it is.
2. There is a "Update catalog from files" option.
3. If one adds categories (which, of course, are purely part of the catalog) to a file, that
isn't in the imported folders list, one should be warned that this requires importing the folder, and asking if one wishes to do so …with a separate and firmer warning, if the file is in an excluded folder.
That would make it completely useless. Especially for someone like me, who disables thumbnail caching.
If the only reason for the "import folder"-lists is thumbnails, then disabling thumbnail caching, should also clear and disable the "import folder"-list.
So what do you want to achieve by using 'import folder'??
Assuming that importing folders is purely about thumbnails, I would want to have NO imported folders, and stop XnView from importating any, ever.
…but as that isn't the case, but that it is importation into the catalog:
I want the folders I import, to be those that the catalog covers …and for folders I mark as excluded (and the files therein), to NOT be included in the catalog.
…and that no other folders (aside from new sub-folders to recursively imported folders) are automatically imported, when I browse!
(unless I mark an option, in the settings, that tells XnView to do so …but only with folders that aren't marked as excluded [or which are subfolders to an excluded folder …unless it's a non-recursive exclusion], of course!)
I can't reproduce, i've tried that:
- create c:\....\folder\1\2\
- add c:\....\folder\1\2 as excluded
- 'import folder' c:\....\folder
- i have only folder & folder\1 in catalog not 2 subfolder
It still happens.
In fact, I manually removed the red folders, and then went to the folders I've excluded, and pressed show recursive.
…and now they're right back in the imported list!
Also:
Why is there a seperate Excluded/Included tab, rather than just having that in the same list?
…and lets not ignore my screenhot (which, I remind you, is only a small part of my full list) and photoshoped screenshot. (showing how it would look, according to my suggestions)
Why should users have to have a lightyears-long list, that is impossible to have any kind of overview of, instead of the far more simple and overviewable list you'd get, according to my suggestion?