rnmerchant wrote: Tue Aug 15, 2023 10:25 pm
I have been wondering about adding text to an image (useful, perhaps, with old historical family photos to identify people).
I understand every time one saves a JPG image the image is 'degraded' a bit further. Is this important enough an effect that one shouldn't use the 'add text' feature rather than using exif fields....? Mind you these images are just family interest and not particularly historically vitally important, so a small amount of degredation may not be that big a deal...
No reason for concern in any normal situation, but understand that the text added can't be edited or removed to restore the original image, so best to keep a copy of the original images if there is any possibility of needing to use them again.
Bringing up the Text dialogue, it seems to default to MS Shell Dlg 2. This is a font I've never heard of. Is there anything important about this default?
Use any font you think suitable...
Edit:
An option which might be worth considering would be to place the added text on new image canvas, for example below the image. When captioning a series of images the new canvas could often be added as a batch operation.
Advantages would include the text possibly being easier to read if placed on a white background rather than directly on the images, and the fact that if required the added text could be removed later by cropping the image, or for that matter replaced by new text if the existing text is first removed by pasting background colour over it.
Note, however, that whichever method is used good quality text will require that images have reasonable pixel dimensions, however when that is not the case there may be some possibility of resizing images to larger pixel dimensions by a factor such as two, if the quality of the resulting images is acceptable