Page 1 of 1
Watermark
Posted: Tue Jan 10, 2006 10:59 am
by KUK
Hi there - first of all --> great proggy!
Had a lot of fun with it .... it does the job in a very fine way.
While googling the forum I found some topics relating watermarking. Just wanted to bring the topic back to mind.
As said before by the other authors - I'd like to "sign" my pics before giving them away. Yes I know ... there are other progs I coul use.
But why should I ...? I'm satisfied wit XN-View.
Would be nice ....
Greetz Kai
Posted: Sun Jan 15, 2006 7:19 am
by sushiko
I would also be interested in knowing how to do this in XnView (if it is possible).
Posted: Sun Jan 15, 2006 12:58 pm
by xnview
sushiko wrote:I would also be interested in knowing how to do this in XnView (if it is possible).
You can use Batch convert + 'add text'
This is not a watermark…
Posted: Sun Jan 15, 2006 7:30 pm
by Clo
Pierre

Hello !
- Indeed, you can add a text by this way, but IMHO this is not a watermark…
- A real watermark (
filigrane in French) is similar to that you can see through a banknote when watching it in front a light-source.
- Hence, this supposes that the
opacity of the text to add - and not only a text, it could be another graphism to import -
must be configurable.
- Moreover, the colours - object and its background - might be set automatically according to the dominant background colour of the picture.
- The location of the watermark on the image could be set on a preview via Drag & Drop of the pre-selected object to add…
- Of course, this should be another standalone function, limited to OSs and formats supporting a variable transparency, so having its own requirements.
Finally, using the batch-convert actually has another inconvenience :
- If you don't change the output-format, you get one message per pic (imagine for 1,000 pics !)
"The file ‹xyz.eee› exists already. Do you want to replace it?"
• A button "Overwrite All" on this message should be welcome, and also useful for all other operations where the output-format is unchanged.
• Just my 0.05 €…

Kind regards,
Claude
Clo
Re: This is not a watermark…
Posted: Sun Jan 15, 2006 7:40 pm
by FlorianH
Clo wrote:- Indeed, you can add a text by this way, but IMOH this is not a watermark…
- A real watermark (filigrane in French) is similar to that you can see through a banknote when watching it in front a light-source.
- Hence, this suppose that the opacity of the text to add - and not only a text, it could be another graphism to import - must be configurable.
- Moreover, the colours - object and its background - might be set automatically according to the dominant background colour of the picture.
- The location of the watermark on the image could be set on a preview via Drag & Drop of the pre-selected object to add…
- Of course, this should be another standalone function, limited to OSs and formats supporting a variable transparency, so having its own requirements.
Some very good suggestions. I thought of something similiar when i read the thread and would welcome such functionality...
Clo wrote:Finally, using the batch-convert actually has another inconvenience :
- If you don't change the output-format, you get one message per pic (imagine for 1,000 pics !)
"The file ‹xyz.eee› exists already. Do you want to replace it?"
• A button "Overwrite All" on this message should be welcome, and also useful for all other operations where the output-format is unchanged.
You can choose in batch convert from
1) replace
2) ask
3) skip
4) rename
When missed…
Posted: Sun Jan 15, 2006 9:20 pm
by Clo
FlorianH

Hello !
Some very good suggestions. …
- Thank you ! I guess there is a lacuna¦confusion here…
… You can choose in batch convert from …
- Indeed I known, but making a quick test for the Pierre's tip, I forgot to set it !

So, you could read :
"… and also useful for all other operations where the output-format is unchanged, while you forgot to set "Replace" in the main dialogue."
• I saw such pictures having a real watermark on the Web… but I don't remember on which page! It's really nice !
• In the practice, I guess it might be so complicated to implement… Hence, it could be a plugin as a DLL or EXE used only by those having appropriate pics and OSs… And some user-programmer could make it, this should help Pierre…

V.G.
Claude
Clo
[OT]
Caution ! 999 • • • 
Posted: Fri Jan 20, 2006 11:32 am
by KUK
Thanks Clo - couldn't explain it better.
As mentioned, I need it for labeling pics,so that they are "copyrighted".
A text will do but a pic (logo) would be better.
Hope we're pushing it not to far.
Greetzs KUK
Posted: Mon Jan 23, 2006 10:41 am
by KUK
Just an idea - I tried the proggy Arles Image Web Page Creator.
You can watermark your pics there. Not that comfortably but at least it works.
Greetz KUK
Watermark
Posted: Wed Aug 02, 2006 7:43 am
by anellic
KUK wrote:Just an idea - I tried the proggy Arles Image Web Page Creator.
You can watermark your pics there. Not that comfortably but at least it works.
Greetz KUK
you can use also
picture-shark to put watermark on jpg picture. It work best
Also I'm interested to a watermark solution in xnview as described by Clo and similar to picture-shark solution
Claudio
Posted: Thu Aug 03, 2006 7:41 am
by ckit
I support the request for true watermarking.