7.2.10 jxl Unexpected setting value
Posted: Sun Mar 16, 2025 1:47 pm
When cjxl.exe is set to -e 0, it displays the following:
＊JPEG XL encoder v0.11.1 794a5dc [AVX2,SSE2]
Invalid flag value for --effort: Valid range is {1, 2, ..., 10}.＊
The file size generated by XnView's 'Compression 0' is 6.77kb, while the file size created by cjxl.exe without an '-e' value is 2.16kb. The fact that 'Compression' allows 0 as a valid value is an implementation error. What do you think?
The cjxl.exe settings are -q 100 -e 〇 -j 0.
sample-image filesize
__________________________________________________________
original | 28.8kb[jpg]|
-e 1 | 2.16kb |
-e 10 | 1.49kb |
-e null (-q only) | 2.16kb |
xnconv Compression (0)| 6.77kb |
I will also attach the file used for the test.
＊JPEG XL encoder v0.11.1 794a5dc [AVX2,SSE2]
Invalid flag value for --effort: Valid range is {1, 2, ..., 10}.＊
The file size generated by XnView's 'Compression 0' is 6.77kb, while the file size created by cjxl.exe without an '-e' value is 2.16kb. The fact that 'Compression' allows 0 as a valid value is an implementation error. What do you think?
The cjxl.exe settings are -q 100 -e 〇 -j 0.
sample-image filesize
__________________________________________________________
original | 28.8kb[jpg]|
-e 1 | 2.16kb |
-e 10 | 1.49kb |
-e null (-q only) | 2.16kb |
xnconv Compression (0)| 6.77kb |
I will also attach the file used for the test.
Thanks to your detailed description I can reproduce