Mouse-wheel makes fun…
Moderators: XnTriq, helmut, xnview
Mouse-wheel makes fun…
Hello !
- A strange (funny) bug I found out :
• First : be sure that the mouse wheel isn't used anywhere for the zooming operations.
1. Open any image dir. containing some animated GIFs in the Browser,
2. Select one …
3. Play with the mouse-wheel : you might get a blown-up frame of the selected animated GIF in the preview,
4. Just wait a few seconds : you will see the pic as its original size 1/1, embedded into the blown up frame in the preview
5. The animation continues to run in the 1/1 image, though
Something like this :
——————————————
• I think it's a …:P
- Win 98 SE - XnView 1.80.1
Kind regards,
Claude
Clo
- A strange (funny) bug I found out :
• First : be sure that the mouse wheel isn't used anywhere for the zooming operations.
1. Open any image dir. containing some animated GIFs in the Browser,
2. Select one …
3. Play with the mouse-wheel : you might get a blown-up frame of the selected animated GIF in the preview,
4. Just wait a few seconds : you will see the pic as its original size 1/1, embedded into the blown up frame in the preview
5. The animation continues to run in the 1/1 image, though
Something like this :
——————————————
• I think it's a …:P
- Win 98 SE - XnView 1.80.1
Kind regards,
Claude
Clo
Old user ON SELECTIVE STRIKE till further notice •
2in1
Dreamer
Hello !
- This occurs too for me with NUM+ in the browser preview and in the "Light" Full screen from the preview.
But there, not with the MW.
- In fact, there are two bugs in one for me :
a) The MW works as a kind of “wild” default in the browser preview, while it should not,
since the MW is not configured for any zooming in the Options.
b) The GIF as 1/1 running its animation in the inopportune blown up frame is the rest of the issue…
• I noticed that it's more difficult to get the bug with so large GIFs, but it occurs too, though.
Kind regards,
Claude
Clo
Hello !
- This occurs too for me with NUM+ in the browser preview and in the "Light" Full screen from the preview.
But there, not with the MW.
- In fact, there are two bugs in one for me :
a) The MW works as a kind of “wild” default in the browser preview, while it should not,
since the MW is not configured for any zooming in the Options.
b) The GIF as 1/1 running its animation in the inopportune blown up frame is the rest of the issue…
• I noticed that it's more difficult to get the bug with so large GIFs, but it occurs too, though.
Kind regards,
Claude
Clo
Last edited by Clo on Sun Oct 26, 2008 2:21 am, edited 1 time in total.
Old user ON SELECTIVE STRIKE till further notice •
For me…
For me, something boring you did not choose and that you cannot disable is not a “feature”, it's a
K R
Claude
Clo
K R
Claude
Clo
Old user ON SELECTIVE STRIKE till further notice •
Bug fixed, but not the "zoom-feature"---
Pierre
Hello !
• The original bug is fixed in 1.80.2 - about the embedded 1/1 image in a blown up frame - thank you !
- However, I've still the unwanted zooming of the preview with the mouse-wheel… while the wheel is set to scroll large images only
Kind regards,
Claude
Clo
Hello !
• The original bug is fixed in 1.80.2 - about the embedded 1/1 image in a blown up frame - thank you !
- However, I've still the unwanted zooming of the preview with the mouse-wheel… while the wheel is set to scroll large images only
Kind regards,
Claude
Clo
Old user ON SELECTIVE STRIKE till further notice •
Re: Bug fixed, but not the "zoom-feature"---
I think it's a new feature, not a bug (and I think it's better).Clo wrote:- However, I've still the unwanted zooming of the preview with the mouse-wheel… while the wheel is set to scroll large images only
Disable if wanted
Hello !
- For me, better should be disabled; I don't like this at all.
The general setting of the mouse-wheel is not applied here, I can't disable this, and so it's a or at least a boring lacuna…
KR
Claude
Clo
- For me, better should be disabled; I don't like this at all.
The general setting of the mouse-wheel is not applied here, I can't disable this, and so it's a or at least a boring lacuna…
KR
Claude
Clo
Old user ON SELECTIVE STRIKE till further notice •
Re: Bug fixed, but not the "zoom-feature"---
In option/View/keyboard, you have not zoom for mouse wheel???Clo wrote: - However, I've still the unwanted zooming of the preview with the mouse-wheel… while the wheel is set to scroll large images only
Pierre.
Abnormal---
Hi Pierre !
- I have not ! The mouse wheel is configured only to scroll the large images, like you can see below :
———————
- So, I don't understand why and from where a zooming by the mouse-wheel can work in the browser "Preview" area
KR
Claude
Clo
- I have not ! The mouse wheel is configured only to scroll the large images, like you can see below :
———————
- So, I don't understand why and from where a zooming by the mouse-wheel can work in the browser "Preview" area
KR
Claude
Clo
Old user ON SELECTIVE STRIKE till further notice •
Re: Abnormal---
Right, i use always the mouse wheel to zoom in the preview area...Clo wrote: Hi Pierre !
- I have not ! The mouse wheel is configured only to scroll the large images, like you can see below :
———————
- So, I don't understand why and from where a zooming by the mouse-wheel can work in the browser "Preview" area
KR
Claude
Clo
Pierre.
Please, a tick-box---
Pierre
This can't be disabled, so what about something like this : "Disable zooming for Preview" ?
———————
- I use the keys NUM + or NUM – for zooming in the preview, and never the mouse-wheel in View…
KR
Claude
Clo
This can't be disabled, so what about something like this : "Disable zooming for Preview" ?
———————
- I use the keys NUM + or NUM – for zooming in the preview, and never the mouse-wheel in View…
KR
Claude
Clo
Old user ON SELECTIVE STRIKE till further notice •
For everybody…
• Hi !
- Indeed, this sounds logical, and'ld do the trick for me.
- However, it seems that some users (and Pierre ?) like the current hard-coded behaviour; then, the tick-box could satisfy everybody… Or else (although you don't like this…), an extra entry for the INI file should be convenient too; the benefit is that Pierre is not bound to change the interface…
G
Claude
Clo
- Indeed, this sounds logical, and'ld do the trick for me.
- However, it seems that some users (and Pierre ?) like the current hard-coded behaviour; then, the tick-box could satisfy everybody… Or else (although you don't like this…), an extra entry for the INI file should be convenient too; the benefit is that Pierre is not bound to change the interface…
G
Claude
Clo
Old user ON SELECTIVE STRIKE till further notice •