XnView Software

My work system is: AMD Sempron SocketA 2400, 512mb ram, WinXP sp2 running dual CRT 17" mon @1024x768 85hz from a Radeon 9550 AGP.

I believe Antares does scroll rapid enough at a somewhat constant pace without any perceptible delay or stuttering. Using the scroll bar arrow up/down is slower than ...

My apology to all loyal XnView users.

Try comparing XnView with Antares10 http://www.download.com/Antares10/3000-2204_4-10463425.html , and see the big performance difference. Too bad it cant handle as many file formats as XnView. So the point is working with large collection of images while not ...

I've just downloaded and try other image viewers:
For the same test case 4000 images at 120x90 thumbnail size.
Microsoft MAX(beta): 210mb of ram.
Microsoft Digital Image Starter Edition 2006: Did not finish after more than 20 min.
Adobe Bridge: 180mb of ram.
But..
ThumbPlus7: only 38mb of ram ...

Please don't attack me for exposing the other dark side of image viewers, not just XnView. This forum is already full of praises and trivial request/suggestions for XnView. My first post is indeed targeted at the developers of XnView, as well as the general "open minded" users. That way the XnView ...

Your motto says "efficient multimedia viewer, browser..." Well in my own observation that is simply not true. XnView is way to inefficient, it sucks up 140mb ram for viewing my 4000+ image folder. Not convinced, I downloaded some other image viewer apps from download.com and this is what I found out ...