Firstly, apologies for the split thread.
Regarding the false rotation, what's frustrating is that the DNG appears correctly, while the JPEG it creates after conversion appears inverted.
Why would this happen?
Is there a way to assure it's converted correctly?
I don't really want to manually ...
Search found 4 matches
- Thu Oct 13, 2016 7:24 am
- Forum: XnConvert
- Topic: Image Rotation
- Replies: 3
- Views: 2208
- Wed Oct 12, 2016 8:51 pm
- Forum: XnConvert
- Topic: Image Rotation
- Replies: 3
- Views: 2208
Image Rotation
<--// Moderator's note: This topic has been split off from “ Poor JPEG Quality ”. //-->
So, new problem.
Image rotation. It appears that a percentage of my portrait format images are being flipped - as if the EXIF data has been inverted on converting to JPEG.
Again, anything I'm missing ...
So, new problem.
Image rotation. It appears that a percentage of my portrait format images are being flipped - as if the EXIF data has been inverted on converting to JPEG.
Again, anything I'm missing ...
- Tue Oct 11, 2016 7:45 pm
- Forum: XnConvert
- Topic: Poor JPEG Quality
- Replies: 2
- Views: 1478
Re: Poor JPEG Quality
Solid gold.
That was exactly it. Now I'm getting great quality.
Thank you.
That was exactly it. Now I'm getting great quality.
Thank you.
- Tue Oct 11, 2016 2:35 pm
- Forum: XnConvert
- Topic: Poor JPEG Quality
- Replies: 2
- Views: 1478
Poor JPEG Quality
Hi.
Here's the scenario:
I take a DNG, run it thorough Photoshop's image processor and get a great JPEG that retains most of it's detail and it's dimensions while reducing the file size.
I try to do the same using XnConvert and can't achieve anywhere near close to the same level of detail. I ...
Here's the scenario:
I take a DNG, run it thorough Photoshop's image processor and get a great JPEG that retains most of it's detail and it's dimensions while reducing the file size.
I try to do the same using XnConvert and can't achieve anywhere near close to the same level of detail. I ...