XnView Software

As announced in the other thread, here is the version without omp. Using regular win32 threads:
http://tn123.ath.cx/gfl/png/gflpng-noomp.zip

Almost all large open source projects have vital online communities (mozilla and ubuntu for example are consumer products).

See:
nntp://news.mozilla.org/ (en mostly, real usenet, accessible via groups.google.com or newsreader)
http://support.mozilla.com/forum/ (en)
http://forums.mozillazine.org ...

Other than CelebNamer I got some other (public) applications that use GflSDK one way or another:

• SimilarImages Finds and displays "near-same"/similar images.
• FastPreview - my own little ShellExt/Viewer. Nothing special indeed

Ithier wrote:Hi,

Is it the same problem that I had some time ago: http://newsgroup.xnview.com/viewtopic.php?t=3017. I haven't tested again, but I don't think it has been solved.

Totally forgot about this thread...

Not "must" but "should".
I second this request

Any news?
Anything I can do to help?
Really gives me headaches.
I feel unconfortable shipping my (minor and unimportant) apps with this bug.
Furthermore I recently work a lot with pngs...

I experienced "cruel" results when I tried to process pngs in a multi-threaded application.
Seems it happens just with some png files while other reliably load.

So the problem is only reading? With which version?

I didn't test writing.

Should be obvious as I linked against libgfl267.dll ...

Where Exactly do you create the DDB?

(btw: try...finally is pretty useless when using BltBlt as Windows does not throw exceptions at you)

Using similar code myself, with BCB (which shares the VCL ), and it works fine...

I experienced "cruel" results when I tried to process pngs in a multi-threaded application.
Seems it happens just with some png files while other reliably load.

Wrote a small test application to outline the issue.
http://tn123.ath.cx/gfl/png/
(code makes use of OpenMP and therefore require visual ...

Might be some DLL that is "injected" into your project from the outside.
(Either something valid or some kind of malware).

SysInternals ProcessExplorer is a great tool to see all loaded modules (and even some minor debugging information).

I'm pretty sure: not the fault of libgfl.dll

And again, missing parameters...

Patch (I just checked stuff from previous bugreport and this one).
--- libgfl.pas.orig 2007-02-06 13:42:38.000000000 +0100
+++ libgfl.pas 2007-02-14 17:41:54.000000000 +0100
@@ -134,6 +134,7 @@
Red: array[0..255] of GFL_UINT8;
Green: array[0..255] of GFL_UINT8 ...

Well, I hope by now you've figured out why no one has yet responded. Putting images in a database is a might poor way of doing things, and if you haven't paid attention to the advice I know you've read already, why would we think you'll listen to what we have to say.

Generating images on-the-fly ...

wasn't there something called gflEnableLZW (patent-issue-resolver :p)?

We tried using the ASP examples and were not able to successful view
the image.

Internet Explorer could not recognize the image and shows it as a small cross

when you rightclick and see the properties of the image, the Content Type says Not Available

Please Suggest!!!

Look at what is returned ...

TGFL_SAVE_PARAMS misses the UserParams: