There is a utility called "JPG-Illuminator" which was written because common image editing tools proved to be unable to correct the exposure on a real-life underexposed image. The discussion leading to this is highly interesting but unfortunately in German.
The classic "oldschool" brightness ...
Search found 11 matches
- Sun Jan 06, 2008 7:36 pm
- Forum: Classic - Bug Reports
- Topic: "Automatic levels" adjustment wrongly implemented
- Replies: 12
- Views: 7868
- Mon Dec 31, 2007 12:16 pm
- Forum: Classic - Bug Reports
- Topic: 256 colors: Worse than 1.91.4?
- Replies: 0
- Views: 774
256 colors: Worse than 1.91.4?
It looks like reduction to 256 colors (no dithering) in 1.92 may give worse results than the old 256 colors (adaptive) implementation found up to 1.91.4. In a sample image containing lots of white (255,255,255) background, the maximum value is (252,254,252). This also leads to a common red tone (255 ...
- Mon Dec 31, 2007 2:20 am
- Forum: Classic - Bug Reports
- Topic: "Automatic levels" adjustment wrongly implemented
- Replies: 12
- Views: 7868
One could call the current implementation "Stretch histogram (linear)" or somesuch, and "Automatic contrast" would become "Automatic contrast (linear)" for consistency. The "real" "Automatic levels" function would need to go into the "Adjust" submenu anyway, where the manual version already resides ...
- Sun Dec 30, 2007 7:05 pm
- Forum: Classic - Bug Reports
- Topic: "Automatic levels" adjustment wrongly implemented
- Replies: 12
- Views: 7868
Re: "Automatic levels" adjustment wrongly implemen
I wonder what the current implementation would be good for.xnview wrote:Yes, currently auto-levels is not like that. but perhaps a good idea to have a basic auto-levels like you said...

- Sun Dec 30, 2007 2:08 am
- Forum: Classic - Bug Reports
- Topic: "Automatic levels" adjustment wrongly implemented
- Replies: 12
- Views: 7868
See German xlation thread - das war mir nämlich auch schon aufgefallen. Evtl. dort einen Kommentar abgeben, ob die Vorschläge so passen.
- Wed Dec 26, 2007 1:44 am
- Forum: Classic - Suggestions
- Topic: Show min/max brightness in "Levels"
- Replies: 0
- Views: 702
Show min/max brightness in "Levels"
Re: Image >> Adjust >> Levels
It would be quite handy if the current absolute lowest and highest brightness values could be shown in this dialog.
Why? Consider a typical scan of a schematic or similar - lots of nominally white background, much less area taken up by (important) darker structures ...
It would be quite handy if the current absolute lowest and highest brightness values could be shown in this dialog.
Why? Consider a typical scan of a schematic or similar - lots of nominally white background, much less area taken up by (important) darker structures ...
- Wed Dec 26, 2007 1:21 am
- Forum: Classic - Bug Reports
- Topic: "Automatic levels" adjustment wrongly implemented
- Replies: 12
- Views: 7868
"Automatic levels" adjustment wrongly implemented
Re: Image >> Map >> Automatic levels
What I think this was intended to do is the same as possible with Image >> Adjust >> Levels, but with automatic setup of black and white point according to minimum and maximum Y value found.
It, however, doesn't do that - after determining the present brightness ...
What I think this was intended to do is the same as possible with Image >> Adjust >> Levels, but with automatic setup of black and white point according to minimum and maximum Y value found.
It, however, doesn't do that - after determining the present brightness ...
- Wed Dec 26, 2007 12:47 am
- Forum: XnView Classic - Translation
- Topic: *** German translation - Deutsche Übersetzung [German]
- Replies: 230
- Views: 194623
- Tue Dec 25, 2007 11:36 pm
- Forum: Classic - Suggestions
- Topic: High-quality arbitrary-angle rotation
- Replies: 8
- Views: 3884
High-quality arbitrary-angle rotation
Currently XnView supports two quality modes of rotation by arbitrary (custom) angles:
1. Crappy - nearest-neighbor interpolation.
2. OK - with "smoothing" checkbox enabled, does bilinear interpolation or somesuch.
What about a really high-quality option that uses e.g. the excellent Lanczos ...
1. Crappy - nearest-neighbor interpolation.
2. OK - with "smoothing" checkbox enabled, does bilinear interpolation or somesuch.
What about a really high-quality option that uses e.g. the excellent Lanczos ...
- Fri Jun 01, 2007 1:03 pm
- Forum: Classic - Suggestions
- Topic: Optional subpixel sampling for high-Q zoom
- Replies: 1
- Views: 1772
Optional subpixel sampling for high-Q zoom
This is a trick that some camera manufacturers use to squeeze more resolution out of their displays (where 320x240 is considered high-res); the infamous MS ClearType also employs it. It requires that the subpixel structure of the display (monitor) be known, since just that is used (something a user ...
- Thu May 31, 2007 10:39 pm
- Forum: Classic - General Support
- Topic: XnView and X-Win32
- Replies: 6
- Views: 2050