Did you really mean lossy here?xnview wrote: Data can perhaps be compressed more when interlaced, but it's lossy.
ok. thank you Pierre.xnview wrote:No it's the same. Progressive jpeg write original picture + pictures at different resolution.
Search found 3 matches
- Tue Apr 12, 2005 4:20 pm
- Forum: Classic - General Support
- Topic: Newbie doubts about png and jpeg
- Replies: 8
- Views: 3448
- Tue Apr 12, 2005 1:35 pm
- Forum: Classic - General Support
- Topic: Newbie doubts about png and jpeg
- Replies: 8
- Views: 3448
- Tue Apr 12, 2005 12:36 am
- Forum: Classic - General Support
- Topic: Newbie doubts about png and jpeg
- Replies: 8
- Views: 3448
Newbie doubts about png and jpeg
I know that this is a complete noob question, but bear with me... I am learning :D
If I save a PNG file as interlaced will quality be sacrificed compared to a non interlaced version? I tested and sizes are different for the same pixel depth and same width/height.
What about progressive jpeg ...
If I save a PNG file as interlaced will quality be sacrificed compared to a non interlaced version? I tested and sizes are different for the same pixel depth and same width/height.
What about progressive jpeg ...