Related to issue in this thread, new thread started to allow wider discussion of possible ways to make fine rotation adjustments easier.
Issues seen:
1. Angle adjustment using the slider very sensitive;
2. Adjustment range may be inconvenient, as explained in above linked thread.
First thoughts:
Possible option to set preferred adjustment range for task, possible wider adjustment slider if practical, possible alternative angle adjustment interface that provides easier control.
Refine Image > Rotate interface for easier use
Moderators: XnTriq, helmut, xnview
-
- XnThusiast
- Posts: 4300
- Joined: Sun Apr 29, 2012 9:45 am
- Location: Cheltenham, U.K.
-
- XnThusiast
- Posts: 2222
- Joined: Sat May 09, 2015 9:37 am
Re: Refine Image > Rotate interface for easier use
I do not like +-360 scale, since +-180 cover all cases already.
Also there is another approach - have base rotation (none,+90,-90,180) and fine scale of 45° (see ACDSee), but I find it overcomplicating.
I would:
Also there is another approach - have base rotation (none,+90,-90,180) and fine scale of 45° (see ACDSee), but I find it overcomplicating.
I would:
- move 'Apply to image' to the top right corner
to be in line with all other instruments
- add 'Automatic deskew' button
as a quick action that may help
- fix scale pointer sensitivity
- use whole numbers only
- increment by 1
- improve render delay
from constant (~0.5sec) to conditional, eg
if image megapixels:
- <10 - realtime
- 10-20 - ~0.5sec
- >20 - 1sec
-
- XnThusiast
- Posts: 4300
- Joined: Sun Apr 29, 2012 9:45 am
- Location: Cheltenham, U.K.
Re: Refine Image > Rotate interface for easier use
Something I don't think I had noticed in my occasional use of the rotate interface is that it is possible to enter a rotation angle directly into the displayed angle box, not sure how 'discoverable' that is?
That would with experience make setting a desired rotation accurately quicker, but could mean using three different components of the existing interface to set a desired accurate rotation quickly: the slider, the up/down arrows and directly entering a rotation angle value.
I do think the existing interface could be improved for ease-of-use, the slider is very sensitive and the up/down arrow increment is fixed at 0.1°, and direct text entry of a rotation angle is not sufficiently self-evident.
Ideas for a possibly significant redesign?
That would with experience make setting a desired rotation accurately quicker, but could mean using three different components of the existing interface to set a desired accurate rotation quickly: the slider, the up/down arrows and directly entering a rotation angle value.
I do think the existing interface could be improved for ease-of-use, the slider is very sensitive and the up/down arrow increment is fixed at 0.1°, and direct text entry of a rotation angle is not sufficiently self-evident.
Ideas for a possibly significant redesign?