Page 2 of 3

Posted: Fri Oct 17, 2008 9:34 am
by Guest
xnview wrote:So not big at all. And always slow with this 300Kb DB?
Do you use categories?
v1.94 is very fast with cache 400+ mb (my old db before optimizing with v1.95). After upgrading to v1.95 browser opens very very slow :(
I dont use categories - category.db = 10 kb.

Posted: Fri Oct 17, 2008 9:35 am
by xnview
Anonymous wrote:
xnview wrote:So not big at all. And always slow with this 300Kb DB?
Do you use categories?
v1.94 is very fast with cache 400+ mb (my old db before optimizing with v1.95). After upgrading to v1.95 browser opens very very slow :(
I dont use categories - category.db = 10 kb.
So slow with or without optimized DB.
Could you send me your email by PM

Posted: Fri Oct 17, 2008 11:52 am
by xnview
Ok, it seems that there is a little problem with last sqlite lib and DB, so if you have a problem, send me your email by PM...

Posted: Fri Oct 17, 2008 3:00 pm
by Micha
Optimizing dosn't help, it stay slow. Only rename the old DB helps, but it could be nice to keep it.

Posted: Fri Oct 17, 2008 3:17 pm
by xnview
Micha wrote:Optimizing dosn't help, it stay slow. Only rename the old DB helps, but it could be nice to keep it.
Please send me your email by PM

Posted: Sat Oct 18, 2008 5:46 pm
by r251
really, open folder with 1.5 gb raw+jpeg
in version 1.94.2 - 1,5 sek
1.95 - 5-6 sek.
cache optimize - not effect.
leave on 1.94.x

Posted: Mon Oct 20, 2008 6:36 am
by xnview
r251 wrote:really, open folder with 1.5 gb raw+jpeg
in version 1.94.2 - 1,5 sek
1.95 - 5-6 sek.
cache optimize - not effect.
leave on 1.94.x
Contact me by PM

Posted: Tue Oct 21, 2008 8:20 am
by xnview
Nobody with slow browsing to test a fixed version??

Posted: Tue Oct 21, 2008 12:59 pm
by Guest
xnview wrote:Nobody with slow browsing to test a fixed version??
Where is the fixed version? ;)

Posted: Tue Oct 21, 2008 1:18 pm
by xnview
Anonymous wrote:
xnview wrote:Nobody with slow browsing to test a fixed version??
Where is the fixed version? ;)
Send me your email by PM

Posted: Wed Oct 22, 2008 8:51 am
by metallithrax
Got a few figures for you

cache size 1019MB

using 1.94 - 1min 15 secs to open thumbs

using 1.95 - no thumbs after 5 mins

1.95.1 wouldn't run, it opened the "DOS" windows then stopped.

I will try it on another machine.

Posted: Wed Oct 22, 2008 8:54 am
by xnview
metallithrax wrote: 1.95.1 wouldn't run, it opened the "DOS" windows then stopped.
????? which link do you have downloaded?

Posted: Wed Oct 22, 2008 6:18 pm
by matt1696
Tested here with the 1.95.1 version downloaded from Betanews.

It's was a lot quicker than 1.95, but still significantly slower than 1.94.2.

Returned to 1.94.2 for now.

Posted: Wed Oct 22, 2008 6:40 pm
by xnview
matt1696 wrote:Tested here with the 1.95.1 version downloaded from Betanews.
It's was a lot quicker than 1.95, but still significantly slower than 1.94.2.
Returned to 1.94.2 for now.
Really? I've tested and for me the speed is almost the same. Slower for how many?
How many files do you have?

Posted: Thu Oct 23, 2008 1:30 pm
by metallithrax
xnview wrote:
metallithrax wrote: 1.95.1 wouldn't run, it opened the "DOS" windows then stopped.
????? which link do you have downloaded?
I'm using the version you emailed me.

It works on a couple of machines at work but not others.

Unfortunately the ones it works on don't have big databases