Page 2 of 2
Re: Change timestamp bug in sort by "name (numeric)"...
Posted: Thu Mar 03, 2011 1:30 pm
by ghost zero
it now works correctly for "name (numeric)", but "name" is now broken. the situation is reversed. can it be fixed so both work correctly?
Re: Change timestamp bug in sort by "name (numeric)"...
Posted: Thu Mar 03, 2011 1:48 pm
by xnview
ghost zero wrote:it now works correctly for "name (numeric)", but "name" is now broken. the situation is reversed. can it be fixed so both work correctly?
'name' is broken???
Re: Change timestamp bug in sort by "name (numeric)"...
Posted: Thu Mar 03, 2011 3:34 pm
by ghost zero
doing the same thing for "name" is now broken
Re: Change timestamp bug in sort by "name (numeric)"...
Posted: Wed Mar 09, 2011 3:38 pm
by xnview
ghost zero wrote:doing the same thing for "name" is now broken
Sorry can't reproduce...
Re: Change timestamp bug in sort by "name (numeric)"...
Posted: Wed Mar 09, 2011 3:52 pm
by ghost zero
doing the same thing below now works correctly for sort by "name numeric". but for doing the same thing for the regular sort by "name", it has the problem.
ghost zero wrote:here are screenshots. first is sorted by "name numeric" and second is by "date". this was after a change timestamp applied to all at once and they're supposed to be sorted the same in both screenshots, but notice they're not because of the bug...
Re: Change timestamp bug in sort by "name (numeric)"...
Posted: Tue Mar 29, 2011 10:53 pm
by ghost zero
any chance of fixing this yet?