Page 1 of 1
B1: 'Add Folder' to thumbnail Cache stops...
Posted: Fri Nov 17, 2006 11:04 pm
by Olivier_G
Go to Options>Thumbnail:Cache and 'Add Folder':
1. Progress bar is not related to the real progression
2. It just stops near the end without closing dialog (it seems to actually work if you use 'Cancel' at the end)
Posted: Sat Nov 18, 2006 1:29 am
by marsh
comfirmed.
Posted: Mon Nov 20, 2006 9:37 am
by robc
Me too. Sorry for double posting...
Re: B1: 'Add Folder' to thumbnail Cache stops...
Posted: Mon Nov 20, 2006 11:44 am
by xnview
Olivier_G wrote:Go to Options>Thumbnail:Cache and 'Add Folder':
1. Progress bar is not related to the real progression
Yes, it's not really a progress bar, because i don't know how many files to process...
2. It just stops near the end without closing dialog (it seems to actually work if you use 'Cancel' at the end)
Right
Re: B1: 'Add Folder' to thumbnail Cache stops...
Posted: Tue Dec 05, 2006 11:44 pm
by Olivier_G
Olivier_G wrote:2. It just stops near the end without closing dialog
Fixed in Beta 2. Thanks Pierre.
xnview wrote:Olivier_G wrote:1. Progress bar is not related to the real progression
Yes, it's not really a progress bar, because i don't know how many files to process...
Can't you make a first quick pass just to evaluate files to thumbnail (ie: not already thumbnailed +corresponds to 'Items displayed:Show as thumbnail' +according to extension checking)?
I move it back to 'Confirmed' because I consider the progress bar issue important enough to be considered as a bug.
Re: B1: 'Add Folder' to thumbnail Cache stops...
Posted: Wed Dec 06, 2006 7:31 am
by marsh
Olivier_G wrote:Olivier_G wrote:2. It just stops near the end without closing dialog
Fixed in Beta 2. Thanks Pierre.
xnview wrote:Olivier_G wrote:1. Progress bar is not related to the real progression
Yes, it's not really a progress bar, because i don't know how many files to process...
Can't you make a first quick pass just to evaluate files to thumbnail (ie: not already thumbnailed +corresponds to 'Items displayed:Show as thumbnail' +according to extension checking)?
I move it back to 'Confirmed' because I consider the progress bar issue important enough to be considered as a bug.
I don't think it is necessary to compute the total number of thumbnails before adding them. Would this not slow things down when using large directories? Progress indicators always seem inaccurate to me anyway (cf. batch convert).
Re: B1: 'Add Folder' to thumbnail Cache stops...
Posted: Wed Dec 06, 2006 7:54 am
by xnview
Olivier_G wrote:xnview wrote:Olivier_G wrote:1. Progress bar is not related to the real progression
Yes, it's not really a progress bar, because i don't know how many files to process...
Can't you make a first quick pass just to evaluate files to thumbnail (ie: not already thumbnailed +corresponds to 'Items displayed:Show as thumbnail' +according to extension checking)?
I move it back to 'Confirmed' because I consider the progress bar issue important enough to be considered as a bug.
Ok, i'll make 2 pass

Re: B1: 'Add Folder' to thumbnail Cache stops...
Posted: Wed Dec 06, 2006 1:10 pm
by Olivier_G
xnview wrote:Ok, i'll make 2 pass

Thank you, Pierre.
marsh wrote:I don't think it is necessary to compute the total number of thumbnails before adding them. Would this not slow things down when using large directories?
I remember robc saying that he launched this 'Add folder' for a whole night and didn't know where it was in the morning
(maybe buggy, though...
) while several people mentionned having a database file of several GBs => having an accurate progress bar is then more important than a 5% difference in speed, especially for a maintenance operation (ie: it's not your average everyday use).
It probably makes even more sense than the 'Thumbnails creation progress bar' when you enter a large folder... and nobody would want to remove this one...

Posted: Thu Dec 07, 2006 7:51 am
by nightflyer
I think that reporting absolute progress is enough (so that for example number of files processed is displayed).
Performing a counting first only adds time to process, while detailed information on completion time is not important- or only for curiosity- because you have to wait until the end, this way or another.
I am against doing a count first. Displaying number of files processed (or directories) should be enough.
Posted: Thu Dec 07, 2006 10:33 am
by GeorgD
nightflyer wrote:I am against doing a count first. Displaying number of files processed (or directories) should be enough.
Mh, I agree for slow devices, but for HDD the number of files is computed within some seconds while the process needs many minutes - and I'd like to know whether I shall turn on the other computer / go to eat/sleep/sports/... or wait or interrupt. Maybe another option?? Hm. Not sure.
Posted: Thu Dec 07, 2006 1:21 pm
by Olivier_G
GeorgD wrote:the number of files is computed within some seconds while the process needs many minutes
For 3500 images from my digital camera (6MP JPEG; 1.5MB) on HD:
- count (properties from XP,
including size!) = 5s
- generate thumbnails (estimated) = 12mn
=> 0.5% slower
(you get accurate progress bar and estimated remaining time in compensation...
)
Posted: Thu Dec 07, 2006 10:04 pm
by robc
I like the current progress bar behavior and consider this as fixed in B3.

Posted: Thu Dec 07, 2006 11:33 pm
by Olivier_G
Right! It's great!