very slow PNG writes
Posted: Wed Sep 16, 2009 3:08 pm
Recently I am using large 8-bit PNG files ,
crooping them and then saving back to PNG format.
The files are about 25 MB large on disk (unpacked 88 MB) .
Loading the PNG takes some 10 sec. , but when I save this file it takes 4 1/2 minute, with full (single core) processor load of a core-2 duo processor.
Curious as I am I did the same test with Photoshop CS4, loading goes with the same speed,
when I save the file in PNG format CS4 uses the 2 cores of my Core-2 duo processor fully,
but yet it takes a full 13 1/2 (!) minute to complete.
I am glad that XnVIEW is about 3 times as fast , but still it takes a very long time,
what is going on here ?? , and is there room for optimization ?
By the way: are there any processes (loading,saving,manipulating data, ... )
where XnView uses all cores of a multi-core processor, or is it only single core ?
René
EDIT: doing the same test with Paint Shop Pro (version 7.02) gives me an even faster write: 66 secs , that should be our target !!
crooping them and then saving back to PNG format.
The files are about 25 MB large on disk (unpacked 88 MB) .
Loading the PNG takes some 10 sec. , but when I save this file it takes 4 1/2 minute, with full (single core) processor load of a core-2 duo processor.
Curious as I am I did the same test with Photoshop CS4, loading goes with the same speed,
when I save the file in PNG format CS4 uses the 2 cores of my Core-2 duo processor fully,
but yet it takes a full 13 1/2 (!) minute to complete.
I am glad that XnVIEW is about 3 times as fast , but still it takes a very long time,
what is going on here ?? , and is there room for optimization ?
By the way: are there any processes (loading,saving,manipulating data, ... )
where XnView uses all cores of a multi-core processor, or is it only single core ?
René
EDIT: doing the same test with Paint Shop Pro (version 7.02) gives me an even faster write: 66 secs , that should be our target !!