Seems to no longer be a problem with the latest version of XnView now that AVIF encoding has been moved to use libheif, while it is still a lot slower than JXL it seems to be catching up in terms of detail retention at speed 5.
Thanks again!
Search found 4 matches
- Tue Nov 07, 2023 2:26 am
- Forum: MP - Suggestions
- Topic: Can libavif be updated in a future release?
- Replies: 1
- Views: 805
- Fri May 05, 2023 6:59 am
- Forum: MP - Suggestions
- Topic: Can libavif be updated in a future release?
- Replies: 1
- Views: 805
Can libavif be updated in a future release?
Hello,
I was wondering if XnConvert and XnView MP could receive an update to libavif in a future release. The latest static Windows builds of libavif 0.11.1 using AOM 3.6.0 (https://ci.appveyor.com/project/louquillio/libavif) have an improved perceptual quality tuning that retains more image detail ...
I was wondering if XnConvert and XnView MP could receive an update to libavif in a future release. The latest static Windows builds of libavif 0.11.1 using AOM 3.6.0 (https://ci.appveyor.com/project/louquillio/libavif) have an improved perceptual quality tuning that retains more image detail ...
- Tue Jan 17, 2023 2:17 am
- Forum: Closed/Resolved
- Topic: WebP quality options
- Replies: 5
- Views: 2866
Re: WebP quality options
I have tested XnView MP 1.4.1 and I can confirm that the new "Use sharp (and slow) RGB->YUV conversion" setting operates correctly and provides an output matching that of the test files from the command line encoder with Sharp YUV enabled.
Thanks once again!
Thanks once again!
- Thu Dec 29, 2022 1:13 am
- Forum: Closed/Resolved
- Topic: WebP quality options
- Replies: 5
- Views: 2866
Re: WebP quality options
Hi all,
I created an account so I could also ask for this feature. WebP's default subsampling behavior just does not look as good as it could without Sharp YUV enabled. There's quite a handy example displayed on another forum here: https://irfanview-forum.de/forum/program/feature-requests/12925 ...
I created an account so I could also ask for this feature. WebP's default subsampling behavior just does not look as good as it could without Sharp YUV enabled. There's quite a handy example displayed on another forum here: https://irfanview-forum.de/forum/program/feature-requests/12925 ...