XnView Software

...of course, by default the 3-state checkbox will be 'Grayed' by default. not too complicated for standard user?? Nope. We use this paradigm in our programs which are used by VERY standard users (or even worse - no offense intended, some of the users of the programs which we make (develop) see the...

...also don't forget to test the "Match" drop-down for "Any" and "All" predicates (that is AND and OR) in the case of the tri-state checkbox.

...of course, by default the 3-state checkbox will be 'Grayed' by default.

- checked: IN (included) - not checked: NOT IN (excluded) - grayed: - doesn't matter - so a 3-states checkbox? Yes. This is the standard behavior in any such filtering engine. For the checked ones you will gather the IDs / PK (primary keys) put comma between them and add them in a SQL IN predicate....

<raises hand>

Yes, I hit this often enough. Basically we cannot drag & drop some selected files if other files are tagged.

It would be a very, very, very nice thing to have it in Batch Convert tho. OK so Photolemur has .8bf file So I guess it can be added to XnViewMP but as you said can it also be added to XnConvert and if how No, It cannot be added to Batch Convert (inside or outside of XnView) and I think that is a l...

I wonder if it could be used as a plugin to Xn.... I know that it works as a plugin with lightroom and photoshop In XnView double-click on a photo. Then go to Image \ Adobe Photoshop Plugin... and press "Configure" to add it. It would be a very, very, very nice thing to have it in Batch Convert tho.

*bump*

yep

1. generates confusion (yes, I know from ACDSee & other packages) 2. slows down the DB quite a bit because the keywords are stored as text and not as reference. Even if they are stored as FKeys, because the keywords aren't constrained the foreign table will grow a lot. IMHO a workflow improvement (y...

You can sort the images by size before converting them and select the desired range (by keeping the Shift pressed). Viewing the images As List would help to see exactly what size(s) you are selecting.

You can't. Only Pierre can do it. ...but be advised: an "Auto" algorithm has different compromises. I wouldn't blindly rely on it for a large batch of photos.

I think that your suggestion is very good but your timing is very bad. We are focused on getting out the 0.91. Bump this thread again after 0.91 is officially released.

Pierre, it is your custom code the one which generates "Copy of foo.jpg" names? yes, but the paste don't know about companions, it copy a list of files, and rename if needed... I suggest that the sidecar should forcibly take the name of the main file. In the case in which such a sidecar exists, it ...