Any way to refresh or re-read the files so changes made in other programs would show up?
When I rate or label a file it will show up in Lightroom. If I edit in Lightroom it will not be seen in xnview.
Only way to do that now is to go in cacheDB and delete thumbnails. (on mac is fast but on winXP I can go have lunch and it still would not be done)
Would be good to add something to click on and have it scan selected files or whole directory with sub-directories for changes.
thanks for a great program
0.33 metadata refresh - winXP/mac
Moderators: XnTriq, helmut, xnview
-
- Author of XnView
- Posts: 41906
- Joined: Mon Oct 13, 2003 7:31 am
- Location: France
Re: 0.33 metadata refresh - winXP/mac
Yes right, if the filedate & filesize are not changed...
So something like 'Synchronise file with DB'?
So something like 'Synchronise file with DB'?
Pierre.
-
- Posts: 52
- Joined: Tue Sep 05, 2006 1:19 am
Re: 0.33 metadata refresh - winXP/mac
That could work.
Thanks Pierre.
Thanks Pierre.
-
- XnThusiast
- Posts: 2010
- Joined: Wed Mar 17, 2004 8:33 pm
- Location: Sarasota Florida
Re: 0.33 metadata refresh - winXP/mac
Yes, that would be perfect...
...plus an indicator on the thumb that the two are "out of sync", if possible.
Perhaps MP needs a "broken" icon for each of the data stores (XMP, IPTC, etc).
Since examining the metadata stores would be slow when there are many files, perhaps the user could invoke a "scan for data synchronization issues" when desired, with an INI setting to perform that automatically.
Just a thought! Are there any situations where such functionality would be useful, or is it "overkill"?
...plus an indicator on the thumb that the two are "out of sync", if possible.
Perhaps MP needs a "broken" icon for each of the data stores (XMP, IPTC, etc).
Since examining the metadata stores would be slow when there are many files, perhaps the user could invoke a "scan for data synchronization issues" when desired, with an INI setting to perform that automatically.
Just a thought! Are there any situations where such functionality would be useful, or is it "overkill"?
John