0.49 - 5-7 seconds per image after double clicking on it

Ideas for improvements and requests for new features in XnView MP

Moderators: helmut, XnTriq, xnview

Post Reply
Litr
Posts: 67
Joined: Wed Oct 12, 2011 9:26 pm

0.49 - 5-7 seconds per image after double clicking on it

Post by Litr »

(My English is very bad, but I can not keep quiet :wink: )


All of the following occurs after a full reading and creating thumbnails:

In folder with lots of image (3000-4000), there is a significant delay to opening single image - 5-10 seconds per image after double clicking on it.
And also a long delay to open folder listing with these pictures (even if the table view mode turned on, not thumbnails) - again 5-10 seconds.

At same time, instant return to file/thumbnail list from opened image...

Thumbnail size: 234, HQ, lossless, with Sharpening
Folder content: jpeg, gif, png

5-7 seconds on the SSD with Core i7 3500 MHz / 8 gigs RAM / Windows 7 x64. This is normal?
User avatar
xnview
Author of XnView
Posts: 46257
Joined: Mon Oct 13, 2003 7:31 am
Location: France
Contact:

Re: 0.49 - 5-7 seconds per image after double clicking on it

Post by xnview »

Yes it's a known issue
Pierre.
User avatar
budz45
XnThusiast
Posts: 1621
Joined: Sun Jun 03, 2007 6:05 pm
Location: UK

Re: 0.49 - 5-7 seconds per image after double clicking on it

Post by budz45 »

Yes, certainly a known issue for version 0.49/0.50. :(

I care about the resolve of this issue passionately and I'm hopeful some future fixes for this shall come.

I have already dreamt of a possible new fix method for this: http://newsgroup.xnview.com/viewtopic.php?f=60&t=25768

...Furthermore XnViewMP in future needs to have ability to run in system tray (Windows) & run at startup in background these solutions will all speeds things up much faster.
All My Topics || my 'MP' Topics
My own Bookmarked topics--->for me only
User avatar
xnview
Author of XnView
Posts: 46257
Joined: Mon Oct 13, 2003 7:31 am
Location: France
Contact:

Re: 0.49 - 5-7 seconds per image after double clicking on it

Post by xnview »

Not with 0.50, it's fixed
Pierre.
Post Reply