0.99.7: Zoom-out does not actually use the resizing algorithm chosen

*** Please report new bugs here! ***

Moderators: helmut, XnTriq, xnview, Dreamer

Post Reply
fireattack
Posts: 103
Joined: Sun Nov 10, 2013 8:02 am

0.99.7: Zoom-out does not actually use the resizing algorithm chosen

Post by fireattack »

1. Go settings -> View -> High zoom quality: Zoom-out and Zoom-in, and choose one of the algorithm in the following drop down menu
2. Open a large image and zoom out (or just fit to window).
3. Change the algorithm.

Comparing two very different algorithms is prefered, like bilinear vs. lanczos4.

You can screenshot at step 2 and 3 and compare them pixel by pixel. There is literally no difference.

This bug does not happen if you zoom-in (enlarge); the algorithm actually makes a difference.
User avatar
xnview
Author of XnView
Posts: 46255
Joined: Mon Oct 13, 2003 7:31 am
Location: France
Contact:

Re: 0.99.7: Zoom-out does not actually use the resizing algorithm chosen

Post by xnview »

zoom is > 100%?
Pierre.
fireattack
Posts: 103
Joined: Sun Nov 10, 2013 8:02 am

Re: 0.99.7: Zoom-out does not actually use the resizing algorithm chosen

Post by fireattack »

no, zoom is < 100%.
fireattack
Posts: 103
Joined: Sun Nov 10, 2013 8:02 am

Re: 0.99.7: Zoom-out does not actually use the resizing algorithm chosen

Post by fireattack »

Bilinear:
bilinear.png
Spline36:
spline36.png
No difference whatsoever.
User avatar
xnview
Author of XnView
Posts: 46255
Joined: Mon Oct 13, 2003 7:31 am
Location: France
Contact:

Re: 0.99.7: Zoom-out does not actually use the resizing algorithm chosen

Post by xnview »

for zoom < 100%, bilinear is always used
Pierre.
fireattack
Posts: 103
Joined: Sun Nov 10, 2013 8:02 am

Re: 0.99.7: Zoom-out does not actually use the resizing algorithm chosen

Post by fireattack »

xnview wrote: Tue Jan 25, 2022 9:34 am for zoom < 100%, bilinear is always used
Well, the option says "high quality for zoom-in and -out" which I thought would include zoom <100%.

High(er) quality downscaling (mainly, sharper) is something I would like to have.
Post Reply