Xnview vs PS Save as JPG (Max.quality)
Moderator: xnview
-
xnrv
- Posts: 14
- Joined: Wed Jun 11, 2014 1:01 pm
Xnview vs PS Save as JPG (Max.quality)
Hello, out of curiosity - why JPGs (saved from PNGs) from Xnview are approx. 35% larger than saved from Photoshop (both are saved with maximum quality). What is the reason? Thanks
-
user0
- XnThusiast
- Posts: 3159
- Joined: Sat May 09, 2015 9:37 am
Re: Xnview vs PS Save as JPG (Max.quality)
different codec
-
xnrv
- Posts: 14
- Joined: Wed Jun 11, 2014 1:01 pm
Re: Xnview vs PS Save as JPG (Max.quality)
and why the more efficient one is not in Xnview?
-
user0
- XnThusiast
- Posts: 3159
- Joined: Sat May 09, 2015 9:37 am
Re: Xnview vs PS Save as JPG (Max.quality)
adobe's codec is proprietary and closed-source, but it isn't 'more efficient' - it's just different
https://photo.stackexchange.com/questio ... ops-0-12-q
https://jpegartifactgenerator.com/blog/ ... ings-guide
https://photo.stackexchange.com/questio ... ops-0-12-q
https://jpegartifactgenerator.com/blog/ ... ings-guide
-
xnrv
- Posts: 14
- Joined: Wed Jun 11, 2014 1:01 pm
Re: Xnview vs PS Save as JPG (Max.quality)
thanks for explanation!
-I'd disagree (especially with today's prices of hard disks. and besides textures size is very important in 3D renderingbut it isn't 'more efficient'