XNview is listed vulnarable to .wmf exploit.

Ask for help and post your question on how to use XnView Classic.

Moderators: helmut, XnTriq, xnview

Post Reply
ckit
XnThusiast
Posts: 2583
Joined: Tue Feb 17, 2004 1:11 am
Location: QLD, Australia
Contact:

Post by ckit »

Oh great, just perfect!

Pierre we fix this now or we cancel 1.82 release all together.
AMD Ryzen 3 3300X 3.8Ghz, 16Gb DDR4, RX6600XT with Dell U2520D at 2560x1440@60Hz scaling 125%
Win11 x64 24H2, Hard Disk Sentinel Pro, MS PowerToys, Process Lasso Pro and Wintoys
marsh
XnThusiast
Posts: 2443
Joined: Sun May 15, 2005 6:31 am

Re: XNview is listed vulnarable to .wmf exploit.

Post by marsh »

dat_dude wrote:<nonsense>
Complete nonsense.
User avatar
robc
Posts: 164
Joined: Mon Nov 14, 2005 12:53 pm

Post by robc »

It shouldn't... Pierre at the time said he's using Windows APIs to render WMFs, so if Windows is patched, so is XnView. The message from SecurityFocus deals with unpatched systems, in fact it lists all OS version that by now have been patched.
ckit
XnThusiast
Posts: 2583
Joined: Tue Feb 17, 2004 1:11 am
Location: QLD, Australia
Contact:

Post by ckit »

All of you guys are Idiots including me for believing in you.
AMD Ryzen 3 3300X 3.8Ghz, 16Gb DDR4, RX6600XT with Dell U2520D at 2560x1440@60Hz scaling 125%
Win11 x64 24H2, Hard Disk Sentinel Pro, MS PowerToys, Process Lasso Pro and Wintoys
Guest

Re: XNview is listed vulnarable to .wmf exploit.

Post by Guest »

marsh wrote:<nonsense>
Complete nonsense.
User avatar
Drahken
Posts: 884
Joined: Sun Apr 10, 2005 4:29 pm

Post by Drahken »

This wmf exploit has been discussed thoroughly on the forums already. The last i noticed of it was that it wouldn't crash your whole system, but that it would cause xnview to close.

Edit: See these threads:
http://newsgroup.xnview.com/viewtopic.p ... hlight=wmf
http://newsgroup.xnview.com/viewtopic.p ... hlight=wmf
Oh the feuhrer, oh the feuhrer, oh the feuhrer's nipples bonk!
marsh
XnThusiast
Posts: 2443
Joined: Sun May 15, 2005 6:31 am

Post by marsh »

Anonymous wrote:
marsh wrote:<nonsense>
Complete nonsense.
:) I agree. The list was funny with Gentoo Linux being listed as vulnerable to a MS OS problem.
Post Reply