Last version can't view some jpg, old version all o.k.

b0ris · Post by **b0ris** » Sat Mar 11, 2006 8:04 am

Problem with last version 1.82.4, old version 1.80.3 view correct.

For example:

ftp://gaps-gw.tstu.ru/pub/00322.jpg

marsh · Post by **marsh** » Sat Mar 11, 2006 8:53 am

Using Options>Read>[x]'Ignore Read Errors' will view that image...

b0ris · Post by **b0ris** » Sat Mar 11, 2006 9:27 am

marsh wrote:Using Options>Read>[x]'Ignore Read Errors' will view that image...

Thanks! With this option all work correct

Proposition: Make this option default checked

Post by **xnview** » Sat Mar 11, 2006 9:31 am

b0ris wrote:
marsh wrote:Using Options>Read>[x]'Ignore Read Errors' will view that image...
Thanks! With this option all work correct

Proposition: Make this option default checked

Really, i think that it's not normal to read files with error by default...

loth · Post by **loth** » Wed Apr 12, 2006 2:59 am

xnview wrote:Really, i think that it's not normal to read files with error by default...

hmm...
@all:
i always asked myself, "why would someone uncheck this option?"
IMHO users want to see all possible bits of an image, even if the file is corrupt or broken.

so for what cases should i uncheck this?

Post by **xnview** » Wed Apr 12, 2006 6:54 am

loth wrote:
xnview wrote:Really, i think that it's not normal to read files with error by default...
hmm...
@all:
i always asked myself, "why would someone uncheck this option?"
IMHO users want to see all possible bits of an image, even if the file is corrupt or broken.

so for what cases should i uncheck this?

I think that if a file has an error, it's important to know, no??

Dreamer · Post by **Dreamer** » Thu Apr 13, 2006 12:09 am

xnview wrote:
loth wrote:
xnview wrote:Really, i think that it's not normal to read files with error by default...
hmm...
@all:
i always asked myself, "why would someone uncheck this option?"
IMHO users want to see all possible bits of an image, even if the file is corrupt or broken.

so for what cases should i uncheck this?
I think that if a file has an error, it's important to know, no??

What about dialog?

helmut · Post by **helmut** » Thu Apr 13, 2006 6:01 am

Dreamer wrote:... What about dialog?

Yes, a message box would be good. For those who don't want to see the message box a checkbox "Don't show this message again" might be useful. (Personally I think that users should be always informed if an image is damaged -> no checkbox.)

loth · Post by **loth** » Thu Apr 13, 2006 3:03 pm

helmut wrote:
Dreamer wrote:... What about dialog?
Yes, a message box would be good. For those who don't want to see the message box a checkbox "Don't show this message again" might be useful. (Personally I think that users should be always informed if an image is damaged -> no checkbox.)

i agree with that, too.

Dreamer · Post by **Dreamer** » Sat Apr 15, 2006 12:27 am

Yes, same as dialog that image has more than 1 frame, but maybe a bit less annoying way to inform should be find...

What about checkbox (for all such dialogs) "Don't show this message 'till I close xnview*'"

It would be useful when viewing multipage icons or folder with many corrupted images.

* - with better wording