Info symbol inflation
Moderators: helmut, XnTriq, xnview
Info symbol inflation
In XnView 1.82 we have various info icons. And in XnView 1.90 we will have another info symbol "XMP". And there will be ratings. And there will be tag boxes. That's many info icons and all these symbols will cover the thumbnail.
To reduce this symbol inflation I think it would be good to introduce a more fine tuned display of info symbols. Some people want to know whether thumbnails are embedded or not, whereas for other it doesn't matter.
I think there should be single checkboxes for activating/deactivating the display of info symbols.
To reduce this symbol inflation I think it would be good to introduce a more fine tuned display of info symbols. Some people want to know whether thumbnails are embedded or not, whereas for other it doesn't matter.
I think there should be single checkboxes for activating/deactivating the display of info symbols.
Yes!
—> Helmut
• I agree and support ! XnView must not become “a gazworks” !
G
Claude
Clo
• I agree and support ! XnView must not become “a gazworks” !

Claude
Clo
Old user ON SELECTIVE STRIKE till further notice •
Re: Info symbol inflation
Ok, in a new panel of thumbnail option??helmut wrote:In XnView 1.82 we have various info icons. And in XnView 1.90 we will have another info symbol "XMP". And there will be ratings. And there will be tag boxes. That's many info icons and all these symbols will cover the thumbnail.
To reduce this symbol inflation I think it would be good to introduce a more fine tuned display of info symbols. Some people want to know whether thumbnails are embedded or not, whereas for other it doesn't matter.
I think there should be single checkboxes for activating/deactivating the display of info symbols.
A choice for all icons?
Pierre.
XnView wrote:
Here is how LightRoom does it:

Even better would be a way to choose which corner of the thumb to show each symbol (as energetically discussedhere).Ok, in a new panel of thumbnail option??
Here is how LightRoom does it:

John
Hej du!GeorgD wrote:Hej Troken, I don't consider this as a high-priority-matter as wellTo be honest: I don't care yet, as it's not that many icons so far. Maybe it'll be important for XnView 2.90
Hej då, Georg
Right, at the moment it no worries, but there are suggestions about rating-icons, colour-icons, rotation-icons and so on, so it might look messy if all are implemented.
Actually, I remember testing XnView the first time (after trying IrfanView and FastStone, bah!

I see, that's right, so we shall already do some brainstormingTroken wrote:Right, at the moment it no worries, but there are suggestions about rating-icons, colour-icons, rotation-icons and so on, so it might look messy if all are implemented.

Me tooTroken wrote:Actually, I remember testing XnView the first time (after trying IrfanView and FastStone, bah!) and I was really impressed with the EXIF and IPTC-icons and I still like them.


/Georg
Which but not where…
—> marsh
Hi B. !
• We can choose which icons are displayed, but not where they are located…
- So, IMHO, this issue is not quite solved definitely…
KR
Claude
Clo

• We can choose which icons are displayed, but not where they are located…

- So, IMHO, this issue is not quite solved definitely…

Claude
Clo
Old user ON SELECTIVE STRIKE till further notice •
Re: Which but not where…
Right. So I move it 'Postponed' = to be discussed for a future version (not 1.90).Clo wrote:We can choose which icons are displayed, but not where they are located…
Olivier