Evgeniy,
Pierre is on holidays and I don't have your sample image. So you either have to wait a bit (Pierre will return on 21st February) or send the image to me. It would be best if you could upload the image on a web server and place a link to it, here. Then, all people could join the discussion and help you.
Reuters and AP are surely important sources of images. It's quite likely and possible that they use PhotoShop for editing their images. Even if this is not IPTC standard, XnView should support this since Adobe PhotoShop is widely used.
Greetings,
Helmut
Several IPTC fields not shown
Moderators: helmut, XnTriq, xnview
Sample AP photo
Thanks you for the help. XNView - the remarkable program. I think that together we shall approach her to perfection.
Thanks you for the help. XNView - the remarkable program. I think that together we shall approach her to perfection.
Phone Xpress - call accounting and billing software
Ok, this problem is fixed.Olivier_G wrote:IIT (Image Info Toolkit), IrfanView are able to show all the IPTC fields correctly...
The image is from 2002, and a comment mentions that it was edited with Photoshop 4 (I don't know if it helps...)
I am surprised that XnView doesn't show all the IPTC fields here![]()
Pierre.
Glad to hear this.xnview wrote:Ok, this problem is fixed.Olivier_G wrote:IIT (Image Info Toolkit), IrfanView are able to show all the IPTC fields correctly...
The image is from 2002, and a comment mentions that it was edited with Photoshop 4 (I don't know if it helps...)
I am surprised that XnView doesn't show all the IPTC fields here![]()
I think this means that this bug also solves the bug I filed here:
http://newsgroup.xnview.com/viewtopic.php?t=1029
Seems I soon can dump my own crappy IPTC reader classes :p
(sorry for bumping this thread)
Before the final version is released, there will be several release candidates available here in this newsgroup. Would be good if you could check whether your bug is fixed or not, then. Release date is a bit unclear at the moment, possibly March.MaierMan wrote:I think this means that this bug also solves the bug I filed here:
http://newsgroup.xnview.com/viewtopic.php?t=1029
...
Greetings,
Helmut