Please give us 2 additional entries for smaller sizes. I like to suggest 96x72 and 128x96,
which are also recommended by Christian Ghisler for TotalCommander's thumbnail view.
A list divider above the 4:3 ratio sizes would be fine, too.
[Solved] Additional thumbnail sizes for 4:3 digicam
Moderators: helmut, XnTriq, xnview
[Solved] Additional thumbnail sizes for 4:3 digicam
The last 3 entries of the actual "View" -> "Thumbnail size" list are for 4:3 ratio digicam images.
Please give us 2 additional entries for smaller sizes. I like to suggest 96x72 and 128x96,
which are also recommended by Christian Ghisler for TotalCommander's thumbnail view.
A list divider above the 4:3 ratio sizes would be fine, too.
Please give us 2 additional entries for smaller sizes. I like to suggest 96x72 and 128x96,
which are also recommended by Christian Ghisler for TotalCommander's thumbnail view.
A list divider above the 4:3 ratio sizes would be fine, too.
Last edited by Lesmo16 on Mon May 23, 2005 6:37 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Everyone who believes in telekinesis, raise my hand!
Are the non-square size a real advantage? If you view portrait images, the thumbnails will be all pretty small, then.
Perhaps a menu item "Custom..." which directly leads to the appropriate option might be useful.
Perhaps a menu item "Custom..." which directly leads to the appropriate option might be useful.
Last edited by helmut on Tue May 17, 2005 8:33 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Re: [REQ:] Additional thumbnail sizes for 4:3 digicam images
I can add 96x72 & 128x96 in thumbnail size, but why do you want to put a divider??Lesmo16 wrote:The last 3 entries of the actual "View" -> "Thumbnail size" list are for 4:3 ratio digicam images.
Please give us 2 additional entries for smaller sizes. I like to suggest 96x72 and 128x96,
which are also recommended by Christian Ghisler for TotalCommander's thumbnail view.
A list divider above the 4:3 ratio sizes would be fine, too.
32x32
48x48
64x48
64x64
85x64
85x85
92x69
96x72
100x100
128x96
192x144
Pierre.
Re: [REQ:] Additional thumbnail sizes for 4:3 digicam images
I think Lesmo is thinking of something like:xnview wrote:I can add 96x72 & 128x96 in thumbnail size, but why do you want to put a divider??
32x32
...
32x32
48x48
64x64
85x85
100x100
-------------
64x48
85x64
92x69
96x72
128x96
192x144
This would make things a bit clearer, but I still wonder what the benefit of all the non-square image formats is (see question above). Let's wait and see what Lesmo and other people say.
Sounds reasonable. So I think we should go for Lesmo's suggestion, but have about the same entries in for both ratios:Hacker wrote:The majority of the images is shot as a landscape. Also, there is no real advantage for portrait pictures in having 96x96 thumbs instead of 128x96 thumbs.This would make things a bit clearer, but I still wonder what the benefit of all the non-square image formats is (see question above).
36x27
48x36
64x48
85x64
92x69
96x72
128x96
192x144
-------------
32x32
48x48
64x64
85x85
100x100
128x128
150x150
192x192
What do other people think? Is there a need for both 92x69 and 96x72?
Ok, i change ithelmut wrote:Sounds reasonable. So I think we should go for Lesmo's suggestion, but have about the same entries in for both ratios:Hacker wrote:The majority of the images is shot as a landscape. Also, there is no real advantage for portrait pictures in having 96x96 thumbs instead of 128x96 thumbs.This would make things a bit clearer, but I still wonder what the benefit of all the non-square image formats is (see question above).
36x27
48x36
64x48
85x64
92x69
96x72
128x96
192x144
-------------
32x32
48x48
64x64
85x85
100x100
128x128
150x150
192x192
What do other people think? Is there a need for both 92x69 and 96x72?
Pierre.
