Clear identification for test versions

helmut · Post by **helmut** » Wed Dec 16, 2009 12:16 am

Whenever there are alpha or beta versions available of XnView (Windows), one can clearly tell that it is a test version: In the title bar it says "XnView 1.97 RC1 (instable)" for example. For XnView MP the same should be done. Currently, people might think that XnView MP 0.21 is a stable and fully functional version, which is definetely not the case.

Post by **xnview** » Wed Dec 16, 2009 7:51 am

helmut wrote:Whenever there are alpha or beta versions available of XnView (Windows), one can clearly tell that it is a test version: In the title bar it says "XnView 1.97 RC1 (instable)" for example. For XnView MP the same should be done. Currently, people might think that XnView MP 0.21 is a stable and fully funcational version, which is definetely not the case.

Right

JohnFredC · Post by **JohnFredC** » Wed Dec 16, 2009 2:25 pm

For testing purposes, it would be great if we could see a sequential build number, too!

oops66 · Post by **oops66** » Wed Dec 16, 2009 2:30 pm

+1 for both suggestions

oops66 · Post by **oops66** » Wed Mar 17, 2010 5:56 pm

Done with the Linux MP 0.25 Version - Thank you Pierre

XnView Software

Clear identification for test versions

Clear identification for test versions

Re: Clear identification for test versions

Re: Clear identification for test versions

Re: Clear identification for test versions

Re: Clear identification for test versions