Hi JFC!
Thanks for a very nice reply.
I am looking into the MP version and I look forward to its release. User defined order of files works very nicely there. I use this function very often to change the order of files and then rename them in a batch with incremental numbering so that the images are sorted in order when they are browsed thru anytime later. That's the main though not the only reason I need this for. Fortunately I have discovered that xnView provides a solution in this direction - changing order of files in the rename batch window. It's not as fast especially with its small thumbnail window, but it will do for now. I am very glad I can stick with this application as I very much enjoy the overall feel of it.
>One of the issues for XnView for Windows (should custom sort be implemented there) is where to save the custom sort order data so that the custom sequence persists after the user leaves the folder. Should it be saved in the folder with the images (this is how MP does it and my personal preference) or should it be saved in the central thumbs database...? This is a subset of a general debate about the best location(s) for saving XnView metadata.
Personally I would choose the single database for one reason: I have set the files with the hidden attribute ON to be visible on my system for more control. Any such file (e.g. desktop.ini, thumbs.db, etc) creates a kind of a mess. For me personally this wouldn't be a big problem either way but generally speaking, I think it is best for any application to leave as few traces as possible.
>Finally user-defined image sequencing is related to the broader (and more complex) topics of lightbox functionality, image stacking, and virtual copies, all of which are very useful functions and would be welcome in XnView.
I have never had much use for these options, but I find them very intriguing and quite advanced. Almost wish I had some use for them so that I can fool around with them
Best regards,
PH