XnView vs. ACDSee: Slow..? (High CPU & Memory)

Ask for help and post your question on how to use XnView Classic.

Moderators: helmut, XnTriq, xnview

User avatar
xnview
Author of XnView
Posts: 46257
Joined: Mon Oct 13, 2003 7:31 am
Location: France
Contact:

Re: XnView vs. ACDSee: Slow..? (High CPU & Memory)

Post by xnview »

boourns wrote:
xnview wrote:
boourns wrote:Bump this up to the top, I have the same problem with this using 1.97.8 (dated 20 Sept 2010). Was this issue solved earlier and has possibly cropped up again?
Which problem do you have? When you open a image file in view mode?
Both browse and view, when you select a new image or view next image it appears to always load the descript.ion
How many line do you have in your description file? Could you send me it?
Pierre.
boourns
Posts: 5
Joined: Sun Nov 14, 2010 1:37 am

Re: XnView vs. ACDSee: Slow..? (High CPU & Memory)

Post by boourns »

Size varies, definitely over 15k lines/entries right now and 2 MB in size. I can't really send the file since it is work related, but looking at it, it seems fairly standard. "Filename" + space + description field. There are special characters in the description though. It think it should be possibly to recreate something similar for testing.

Definitely has to do with the number of entries and not loading the file though. If I manually copy the descript.ion to another directory and only copy over a few images the same loading time issues occur. When I pad a smaller one with plain text not in descript.ion format it has no effect on loading speed. So even with properly formatted entries that don't exist in the current directory it is also slow.

I did a quick test with a dummy file in a test directory which seems to reproduce the issue for me. Looks like this:

Code: Select all

test.jpg desc desc desctest
test2.jpg desc desc desctest
testimage.jpg desc desc descdesc desc descdesc desc descdesc desc descdesc desc descdesc desc descdesc desc descdesc desc descdesc desc descdesc desc descdesc desc descdesc desc descdesc desc descdesc desc descdesc desc descdesc desc descdesc desc desc
testimage.jpg desc desc descdesc desc descdesc desc descdesc desc descdesc desc descdesc desc descdesc desc descdesc desc descdesc desc descdesc desc descdesc desc descdesc desc descdesc desc descdesc desc descdesc desc descdesc desc descdesc desc desc
I repeated the last entry for testimage.jpg thousands of times and put two images in the same dir named test.jpg and test2.jpg. Seems to repro the issue. I can send you this set of test files if you like. What's the best way?
boourns
Posts: 5
Joined: Sun Nov 14, 2010 1:37 am

Re: XnView vs. ACDSee: Slow..? (High CPU & Memory)

Post by boourns »

Just checking in to see if you were able to reproduce this and whether there might be an easy fix?

Thanks!
User avatar
xnview
Author of XnView
Posts: 46257
Joined: Mon Oct 13, 2003 7:31 am
Location: France
Contact:

Re: XnView vs. ACDSee: Slow..? (High CPU & Memory)

Post by xnview »

Pierre.
boourns
Posts: 5
Joined: Sun Nov 14, 2010 1:37 am

Re: XnView vs. ACDSee: Slow..? (High CPU & Memory)

Post by boourns »

Beta works great, thanks!
Post Reply