- Smooth: enabled
"High quality": Reduce disabled, Enlarge disabled
Zoom setting: Fit to image to window
- Smooth: enabled
"High quality": Reduce enabled, Enlarge enabled
Zoom setting: Fit to image to window
Sorry for not applying logic before posting.
rotate and cut in one step
Moderators: XnTriq, helmut, xnview
-
JohnFredC
- XnThusiast
- Posts: 2010
- Joined: Wed Mar 17, 2004 8:33 pm
- Location: Sarasota Florida
Re: rotate and cut in one step
XnView 1.98.2:
Sorry for not applying logic before posting.
Sorry for not applying logic before posting.
John
-
xnview
- Author of XnView
- Posts: 44325
- Joined: Mon Oct 13, 2003 7:31 am
- Location: France
Re: rotate and cut in one step
Strange, so it's only the viewing? If you have not 'high quality', it's better? And for the spped between XnView & XnViewMP?JohnFredC wrote: I think the high-quality setting explains the performance differential. Enabling "High quality" in 1.98 slows the rotate considerably.
Pierre.
-
JohnFredC
- XnThusiast
- Posts: 2010
- Joined: Wed Mar 17, 2004 8:33 pm
- Location: Sarasota Florida
Re: rotate and cut in one step
Toggling high quality between Reduce and Off has no visible effect (to this test) in either tool (I'm just counting seconds, not using a stopwatch).
Also, enabling smoothing and cropping (in 1.98.2) also don't appear to make a significant difference.
After comparing many runs of 1.98.2 "free rotate smooth and crop" and MP "crop rotated selection", 1.98.2 is consistently about 50% faster.
Perhaps in a future MP, free rotate will be available and I will test again.
Also, enabling smoothing and cropping (in 1.98.2) also don't appear to make a significant difference.
After comparing many runs of 1.98.2 "free rotate smooth and crop" and MP "crop rotated selection", 1.98.2 is consistently about 50% faster.
Perhaps in a future MP, free rotate will be available and I will test again.
John
-
xnview
- Author of XnView
- Posts: 44325
- Joined: Mon Oct 13, 2003 7:31 am
- Location: France
Re: rotate and cut in one step
I've tried, but not faster for me. (even fastest on xnviewmp)JohnFredC wrote:After comparing many runs of 1.98.2 "free rotate smooth and crop" and MP "crop rotated selection", 1.98.2 is consistently about 50% faster.
You means "slow" is the time to process the rotation, right?
(I use the same method for the XnView & XnViewMP)
Pierre.
-
JohnFredC
- XnThusiast
- Posts: 2010
- Joined: Wed Mar 17, 2004 8:33 pm
- Location: Sarasota Florida
Re: rotate and cut in one step
Well, still apples to oranges.
1. The time estimated for 1.98.2 is from the instant I finish typing the rotation amount into the rotation dialog until the instant the rotation result appears in the view.
2. The time in MP is the instant I click crop in the toolbar (-after already having drawn/rotated the selection with the mouse)) to the instant the crop result appears in the view.
As I said, apples to oranges, but #2 is consistently about twice as long as #1.
Let's wait until we have an actual free rotate command in MP before drawing too many conclusions. I only reported this because it seemed such a big difference between the two...
1. The time estimated for 1.98.2 is from the instant I finish typing the rotation amount into the rotation dialog until the instant the rotation result appears in the view.
2. The time in MP is the instant I click crop in the toolbar (-after already having drawn/rotated the selection with the mouse)) to the instant the crop result appears in the view.
As I said, apples to oranges, but #2 is consistently about twice as long as #1.
Let's wait until we have an actual free rotate command in MP before drawing too many conclusions. I only reported this because it seemed such a big difference between the two...
John
-
xnview
- Author of XnView
- Posts: 44325
- Joined: Mon Oct 13, 2003 7:31 am
- Location: France